1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
umka21 [38]
3 years ago
5

During the presidency of John Adams, both France and Britain

History
2 answers:
Aleonysh [2.5K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

became under attack in the war

erica [24]3 years ago
4 0

Britain and France were at war, which directly affected American trade.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did France plan to give the Statue of Liberty to the United States in 1876?
Anastaziya [24]
The Statue of Liberty was given to the US by France as a gift. It was designed by  Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi<span> and built by </span><span>Gustave Eiffel. It is a woman representing Libertas a Roman goodness. It is a symbol of freedom and also a welcoming sight for the immigrates who come to the US.</span><span />
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The chart lists characteristics of the Roman Empire, the Han Dynasty, and the Gupta Empire. Based on the chart, which two empire
beks73 [17]

Answer:

Han dynasty and Gupta empire

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
The militaristic kaiser wilhelm forces otto von bismarck to resign in germany. T/F
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

It's TRUE (T)

Explanation:

Bismarck was the one who unites Germany and had a huge influence on political affairs. However, when Wilhelm rises the power, his political views were completely different from Bismarck, especially his ideas about foreign relations, and the treatment given to opposite political groups. Plus, Bismarck knows Wilhelm since his childhood, and the Chancellor thought that could influence more. Wilhelm was advised that, in order to be a strong Kaiser, he should take Bismarck of from the political affairs. So, he forced him to resign in March 1890.

6 0
3 years ago
How did the supreme court ruling in brown v. Board of education affect race relations in the United states during the 1950s?
Tasya [4]

The ruling of Brown v Board of Education changed race relations in the USA during the 50's by having children be able to be in the same school together, but it also made many people angry and had parents protesting outside schools. So it had negative and positive affects for people, but overall ended the belief of "separate but equal" in the United States.

3 0
3 years ago
What is not a reason given in the article as to why the Soviet Union continuing to gain power was a problem for the United State
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

<em>Hello There Again. the correct Answer B. </em><u><em>Soviet Union seeks to spread a "fanatic" belief in communism, which is opposite the beliefs of the United States.</em></u>

Explanation:

Because The concept of "socialism in one country" was conceived by Stalin in his struggle against Leon Trotsky and his concept of permanent revolution. In 1924, Trotsky published his pamphlet Lessons of October in which he stated that socialism in the Soviet Union would fail because of the backward state of economic development unless a world revolution began. Stalin responded to Trotsky's pamphlet with his article, "October and Comrade Trotsky's Theory of Permanent Revolution". In it, Stalin stated, that he did not believe an inevitable conflict between the working class and the peasants would take place, further adding that "socialism in one country is completely possible and probable". Stalin held the view common amongst most Bolsheviks at the time; there was possibility of real success for socialism in the Soviet Union despite the country's backwardness and international isolation. While Grigoriy Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev and Nikolai Bukharin, together with Stalin, opposed Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution, they diverged on how socialism could be built. According to Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev supported the resolution of the 14th Conference (held in 1925) which stated that "we cannot complete the building of socialism due to our technological backwardness." Despite the rather cynical attitude, Zinoviev and Kamenev did believe that a defective form of socialism could be constructed. At the 14th Conference, Stalin reiterated his position, claiming that socialism in one country was feasible despite the capitalist blockade of the country. After the conference, Stalin wrote "Concerning the Results of the XIV Conference of the RCP(b)", in which he stated that the peasantry would not turn against the socialist system because he believed they had a self-interest in preserving.[43] The contradictions which would arise with the peasantry during the socialist transition, Stalin surmised, could "be overcome by our own efforts". He concluded that the only viable threat to socialism in the Soviet Union was a military intervention.

In late 1925, Stalin received a letter from a party official which stated that his position of "Socialism in One Country" was in contradiction with Friedrich Engels own writings on the subject. Stalin countered, stating that Engels' writings 'reflected' "the era of pre-monopoly capitalism, the pre-imperialist era when there were not yet the conditions of an uneven, abrupt development of the capitalist countries." From 1925 onwards, Bukharin began writing extensively on the subject, and in 1926, Stalin wrote On Questions of Leninism, which contained his best-known writings on the subject. Trotsky, with the publishing of Leninism, began countering Bukharin's and Stalin's arguments, claiming that socialism in one country was possible, but only in the short-run, and claimed that without a world revolution it would be impossible to safeguard the Soviet Union from the "restoration of bourgeoisie relations". Zinoviev on the other hand, disagreed with both Trotsky and Bukharin and Stalin, holding instead steadfast to Lenin's own position from 1917 to 1922, and continued to claim that only a defecting form of socialism could be constructed in the Soviet Union without a world revolution. Bukharin, by now, began arguing for the creation of an autarkic economic model, while Trotsky, in contrast, claimed that the Soviet Union had to participate in the international division of labour to develop. In contrast to Trotsky and Bukharin, Stalin did not believe a world revolution was possible, claiming in 1938 that a world revolution was in fact impossible, and claiming that Engels was wrong on the matter. At the 18th Congress, Stalin took the theory to its inevitable conclusion, claiming that the communist mode of production could be conceived in one country. He rationalised this by claiming that the state could exist in a communist society, as long as the Soviet Union was encircled by capitalism. However, surprisingly, with the establishment of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe, Stalin claimed that socialism in one country was only possible in a large country like the Soviet Union, and that the other states, in order to survive, had to follow the Soviet line.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The treaty of nanjing established which three of the following policies
    9·2 answers
  • Who made a covenant with God in which land was promised to the Hebrew people?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following countries is involved in the north american free trade agreement?
    11·1 answer
  • The photograph shows a building destroyed by an earthquake in Mexico City in 1985. The Mexican people blamed scenes such as this
    13·2 answers
  • According to the _____ theory, if one nation adopted Communism, nearby nations would be likely to adopt it as well.
    7·2 answers
  • The biggest issue between the papacy and the monarchy of Western Rome was _____.
    10·1 answer
  • Which type of tax is Georgia's greatest state revenue source?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the climate of India and why is it called a subcontinent?
    7·1 answer
  • In what ways did the industrial revolution negatively impact the environment of it's urban centers​
    9·1 answer
  • 5. Briefly explain how Progressives saw the expansion of governmental powers in wartime as an opportunity to reform American soc
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!