Answer:
In the period from 1895 to 1905, the legal formation of the basic doctrine of American hegemony and the organization of the American Great Space was completed. The Monroe Doctrine was expanded into the Olney Doctrine (1895) and the addition of Theodore Roosevelt (1904), which directly proclaimed US claims for the right to exercise “international police force” in Latin America. The new US foreign policy doctrine was set out in a note of protest by US Secretary of State Olney of July 20, 1895 to the British government over its actions against Venezuela. The Olney Doctrine was designed to make 'tremble' not only with England and other European powers, but also the Latin American states themselves, whose interests the United States allegedly defended.
Olney doctrine has become the foundation of US power politics around the world, although the United States still used the Monroe Doctrine for propaganda and mystification of history. In Olney Doctrine, the principles of 1823 were combined with the idea of US hegemony in the Western Hemisphere; further development of the Monroe Doctrine led to its merging with the principles of interventionism.
Explanation:
Charlemagne was able to unite practically the whole Western Europe and to proclaim himself the Holy Roman Emperor. By creating certain institutions he stabilized his government in the country.
Explanation:
Continuing the policy of expansion of the Frankish kingdom started by his father, during 46 years of his reign, Charlemagne led 53 military campaigns to spread Christianity and protect the Frankish state from the incursion of neighbors, but also to impose his hegemony throughout the West.
After the establishment of the empire, he focused his activity on organization, and reduced his personal share in military ventures by leaving them to his sons.
Self-taught and a lover of grammar, Charlemagne sought to promote knowledge. His desire to educate the clergy prompted cultural renewal, the so-called the Carolingian renaissance or reform.
Answer:
Some simple reasons for this could be that it is easier to manage spheres of influences that to manage a a system of colonies , and it is cheaper. The costs of running, occupying and defending colonies was high. You can get political, diplomatic subordination of weaker nations and trade and economic advantages in a spehere of influence, without having to occupy those countries militarily. This is a simple analysis maybe, but it seeks to highlight some pragmatic aspects.
Explanation:
1. In his text "Revonverting Mexican Americans," the author Daniel Schorr talks about the ways in which Mexicans and Mexican-Americans were welcomed back to the country after WWII. He tells us that they are often the last people to be hired and the first ones to go. He also tells us that prejudice against Mexican-Americans is sustained by the views that Americans have of history, for example, in the battle of the Alamo. He thinks that such stories view Mexicans as inherently lazy and dishonest, which perpetuates discrimination.
2. He believes that resentment among Mexican Americans will not be contained because people will eventually begin to demand rights and equality. He argues that they "can be trodden on just so long." This is based on the fact that Mexican Americans are an essential part of the country, and they deserve the same rights as everyone else.
C, “With malice toward non; with charity for all”.
