1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mkey [24]
4 years ago
5

Erika is building a Lego structure of two towers. She finds that she can only build them so high before they collapse. She then

remembers a cartoon she watched about how archways don't fall because of the keystone at the top of the arch, and so she rebuilds her towers that way. This time her towers stay upright. Erika has solved her problem by ____________________.
Social Studies
2 answers:
lutik1710 [3]4 years ago
8 0

Answer: Evoking memory from the past

Explanation: The application of past theory, knowledge, lessons or ideas can be of immense use for solving present or future problems. Being able to retain and apply previously learnt knowledge or expertise could be attributed to the process of evoking memory from the past.

In the scenario above, after several failed attempts by Erika to construct two towers with her Lego due to height constraints. However, Erika was able to evoke memory and apply what she learnt about keystones and archways. Thus she was able to prevent her 'Lego constructed tower' from falling.

Grace [21]4 years ago
5 0

1

Answer:

Erika solved her problem by activating memories from the past.

Explanation:

Erika is having problems with the Lego structure she is creating. She wants to solve this problem and for that reason, she starts to think about what could help her keep her structure stable, without collapsing.

At that moment, Erika, searched her memory, if she knew something that could help her, that's when she activated a memory from the past that showed that she watched a cartoon that showed something that could work. So, she managed to solve her problem.

You might be interested in
What has the lasting impact of the structure of government illustrted in the table
Karolina [17]
The structure has prevented the executive branch from having any real power. The structure has allowed the judicial branch to exercise executive powers.
4 0
3 years ago
An expert team of scientists compared 1,000 sets of monozygotic twins reared by their biological parents The researchers asked t
Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

if mothers were more negative toward one of their twins, that twin became more antisocial at age 7 than at age 5

Explanation:

An expert team of scientists compared 1,000 sets of monozygotic twins reared by their biological parents The researchers asked the mothers to describe each twin. Descriptions ranged from very positive to very negative. The researchers measured personality at age 5 (including antisocial behavior as reported by kindergarten teachers) and then measured each twin's personality two years later. The results revealed IF MOTHERS WERE MORE NEGATIVE TOWARD ONE OF THEIR TWINS, THAT TWIN BECAME MORE ANTISOCIAL AT AGE 7 THAN AT AGE 5

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Any two dimensions of development
Gwar [14]
A sense of self and a relationship with others.
3 0
3 years ago
Is it true that researchers looking for cause-and-effect relationships will most often use epidemiological studies because they
konstantin123 [22]

<u>Answer: </u>

Yes, it is true that researchers looking for cause-and-effect relationships will most often use epidemiological studies.

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • The functioning pattern of the epidemiological study characterizes its method and manner of probing and investigating to the depth of the issue in order to find the root cause of the problem that has been encountered.
  • Thus, to probe for a cause and effect relationship, an epidemiological study would prove to be highly beneficial as it would put to use the right methods of investigation.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • true or false: Muslim advances in science and medicine spreading across Europe was on effect of the Crusades?​
    15·2 answers
  • Using complete sentence, describe why people began to question the rule of man and divine rights of kings. How is the rule of la
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these terms refers to the culture learned by a person born into a society?
    13·1 answer
  • Did the committees of observation and inspection enjoy widespread popular support? why or why not?
    15·1 answer
  • In a recent meta-analysis improved social reasoning and attitudes towards outgroups was linked to
    5·1 answer
  • The Constitution made no mention of a presidential cabinet.<br> a. True<br> b. False
    5·1 answer
  • What is the factors of production
    12·2 answers
  • What are three positive things that John Reynolds is credited with doing ?
    5·1 answer
  • Which substance can be broken down by chemical<br><br> change
    14·1 answer
  • Fay offers to pay grey $50 for a tennis lesson for hetty. They agree to meet the day after tomorrow to exchange the cash for the
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!