1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oee [108]
3 years ago
15

Explain the ideologies implied by the statements of: the letter to the u.s. congress signed by 100 leading economists, joseph st

iglitz, bob corker, the republican resolution on the bailouts, robert higgs, and michael winther.
History
1 answer:
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
3 0
The declarations of the letter to the U.S. Congress by the economists concerning the bailouts are evidently specified the disagreement of the source of the letter about the GM bailout. The document stated that the bailout would disrupt the notion of free market in U.S. and that it will break the people who held in the free market (Velasquez, 2012). Also, the bailout and government interference will shift the free market economy into socialism (ibid). The economists and other parties which is convoluted in the making of the letter, sustained the free market economy. They do not approve on government interruption as it disrupts the mechanism of the market that is free of any interference particularly from the government. The sources of the letter thought that it was GM’s own accountability to bail itself out of the insolvency. The bankruptcy was a consequence of bad management of the company and it was its own accountability to resolve the matter. The interference by the government will move the market mechanism. The bailout will disturb the equal right of the people of life, freedom, and possessions as what John Locke’s notion. Furthermore, government meddling will also lower the public’s safety based on Adam Smith’s theory.
You might be interested in
Why would the act of nullification have weakened the union?
den301095 [7]

Nullification is where a state has a right to disagree with a federal law they think is unconstitutional and not correct, and no longer abide by it. Nullification would have weakened the Union because states would no longer have to agree or act on certain laws, causing obvious conflict within the state and conflict between Congress and the state. The state would no longer be unified and a quarrel between people in the state, the states, and between the state and the Congress would deepen and would most likely lead to war and weaken the Union.

8 0
2 years ago
What is the significance of the Democratic National Convention of 1968?
LenKa [72]
D the answer j. Nuehehhd
8 0
2 years ago
Did Christian Kings of Europe achieve their goals during the Crusades?
katovenus [111]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

The crusades are considered by many a failure because there was a distinct lack of conversion, A majority of the forces got sick and died or were killed, and the holy land was never truly recovered.

8 0
3 years ago
Why was James I resistant to working with Parliament?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

The answer is option 4: <u>He believed in the absolute power of kings.</u>

The England King James I (who ruled from 1603 to1625) clashed with the Parliament's ideas several times for his persistent belief in the absolute power of kings, justified for their divine right, which enabled him to rule over all their subjects without interference from anyone. Instead, the Parliament believed that the King must not rule alone, doing all that he pleased.

They both had very different views on how royal finances had to be handled as well as foreign affairs, for example, the Parliament members held that tax collection was an issue that had to be approved by them in order to improve the crown's finances, which had been seriously weakened by the long war with Spain (1585-1604), as for James I, he wanted to collect the taxes on his own, whose purpose wasn't only to improve the government but also to over-spend on his luxury way of living.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the focus of the NAACP's fight in the 1930s?
Fantom [35]
I believe your answer would be C! Hope this helps =]
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • how dose americas pre world 2 isolationism relate to a discussion of the marshall plan, the berlin airlift and nato?
    14·1 answer
  • The new england colonies' economy relied heavily on
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Japan expand into Korea and Manchuria in the 1890s? A) Japan was worried that the Chinese military would invade those sa
    6·2 answers
  • Can somebody just write at least 3 sentences only and plz use real information (you can use google) thx!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Boll Weevil Monument
    14·2 answers
  • thousands of english puritans arrived in Massachusetts bay as they fled persecution in England which term is associated with thi
    5·1 answer
  • How did ummayads bring new lands into the muslim empire
    14·1 answer
  • Who taught that justice consisted of treating all persons as though they were neighbors and that treating people in this way was
    11·1 answer
  • 25 pts plz help!!!! In 1842, the Chinese Emperor was forced to sign the Treaty of Najing. Because of this treaty _____. Select t
    13·1 answer
  • Where were the first citites in North and South America built ?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!