The proper use of a conclusion is to restate the main argument or claim so I would go with A). To reinforce the primary claim.
The answer is A. if the essay was suppose to be descriptive then the description or what was being described should have made the reader felt as though they were experiencing it themselves.
Answer:
put on 30
Explanation:
30 best one ever when i had a test i picked 30 and it was right so i suggest 30 the good plot
Answer: hi! I'll help the best I can
Good ways
Life would be boring
We couldn't cure diseases
It would make it harder to transport
People could pass away more often
We wouldn't be able to communicate in long distances
Good ways
less car accidents would happen
less self murders would happen because of cyber bullying
we could all spend more time together
anxiety would go down from less use of social media
our eyes would improve.
The earth wouldn't be poluted
Explanation:
So in conclusion there is a huge controversy about this and it would be very hard actually pinpoint if technology would be good.
The sound argument is this one:
<span>All teachers wear vests. Mr. Gonzales does not wear a vest. Therefore, Mr. Gonzales is not a teacher.
If ALL teachers wear vests, then it means that everyone who is a teacher is wearing a vest: you can recognise a teacher by their vest. So someone who is not wearing a vest, such as Mr. Gonzales, is not a teacher.
</span>
