Based on the question above, Dickens did not consider the second man as a good listener.
<h3>Synopsis</h3>
From the text, he has clearly defined a good listener.
<h3 /><h3>
Good listener</h3>
- Knowing what to listen to, the good listener also knows what not to listen to; knowing the time to listen, he also knows the time to talk. When he feels that this time has come, it is clear that he must make a better talk.
<h3>Good talker</h3>
- I also agree with Dickens on who a good talker or listener should be. A good talker knows the maxims of communication and so does a listener.
In conclusion, we can conclude that the correct answer is No. He would not consider him to be a good listener.
Learn more about Dickens here: brainly.com/question/25874822"
TRY B. It resembles him ruling the country by himself without anyone to help judge the decision:)
<span />
