Answer:
1. The size of the economy as a whole grows as a result of free trade.
2. Consumers benefit from free trade.
3. Free trade can reduce cost of trading:
Explanation:
The three strongest arguments that you can offer to the Indian government about why the policy shift to freer trade is desirable for India are as follows:
1. The size of the economy as a whole grows as a result of free trade: It provides for more efficient production of goods and services. This is because it encourages goods and services to be created in areas with the finest natural resources, infrastructure, or skills and experience. It boosts productivity, which can lead to greater long-term wages. There is universal consensus that growing global trade has boosted economic growth in recent decades.
2. Consumers benefit from free trade: By removing barriers and promoting competition, it lowers prices. Quality and choice are likely to improve as a result of increased competition.
3. Free trade can reduce cost of trading: Non-tariff barriers can be reduced, resulting in less red tape and lower trading costs. Companies that deal in multiple nations might reduce their compliance expenses by working with a single set of laws. In principle, this will lower the cost of goods and services.
The income elasticity of real money demand d. 3/4
Increase in real money demand = Increase in nominal money demand - Increase in inflation = 4% - 1% = 3%
Income elasticity of real money demand = % increase in real money demand / % increase in real income
= 3% / 4%
= 3/4
Income elasticity of demand is a monetary measure of how responsive the amount of demand for a very good or provider is to trade-in earnings. The formulation for calculating earnings elasticity of demand is the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by using the percent change in earnings.
In economics, the profits elasticity of call for is the responsivenesses of the quantity demanded an amazing to an alternate in patron profits. It is measured because of the ratio of the share exchange in the amount demanded to the proportion exchange in profits.
If the earnings elasticity of call for is more than 1, the best or carrier is taken into consideration a luxury and profits elastic. An amazing provider that has an earnings elasticity of call for between zero and 1 is considered an ordinary correct and income inelastic.
Learn more about Income elasticity here: brainly.com/question/15899715
#SPJ4
Answer: If the material is reworked and sold, Hodge Inc. has a financial disadvantage of (- 4500).
Let's see why:
1) If we sell the material at its disposal value: We have a cost of $ 74600 and the income from sale would be $ 57400 =
57400 - 74600 = (-17200). We have a loss of $17200.
2) If we rework the material we will have an original cost of $ 74600, an additional cost for reworking of $ 1500 and the income from its sale would be $ 54400 =
54400 - (74600 + 1500) = (-21700) We have a loss of $ 21700.
Then comparing the 2 situations =
(-21700) - (-17200) = -4500. There is a financial disadvantage of $4,500 if the material is reworked instead of selling it as scrap.
In citing the source in MLA format, Fatima should place the
title as the first to be read or written, followed by the author and citation
in the end. So it should be, “Benefits of Laptops” by Michael Gray. Technology
Now, August 2, 2013. Web. March 16, 2014.
Answer: $3360
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the amount of cash paid by SH to Oakley will be calculated as thus:
SH will be entitled to a discount of 4% since the payment was made within the discount period, therefore, the discount that is applicable will be:
= $4500 - $1000
= $3,500
Therefore, the amount of cash payment that is made by SH to Oakley will be:
= $3,500 - (4% × $3,500)
= $3500 - (0.04 × $3500)
= $3500 - $140
= $3360
Therefore, the amount of cash paid by SH to Oakley is $3360.
