1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
expeople1 [14]
3 years ago
8

U.S. President Woodrow Wilson was the founder of the League of Nations. How justified is the statement?

History
1 answer:
skelet666 [1.2K]3 years ago
7 0
This statement is somewhat justified, since Wilson pushed for a body that would put an end to conflicts like World War I, but he alone was not the single founder, since it took many countries to participate. 
You might be interested in
Which statement explains why the United States remained out of World War II prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor?
VashaNatasha [74]
Because it was said that the usa was not to make alience with allied forces because we did not want to go  to war
8 0
3 years ago
What was the Sadducees effect on the Jewish people?
lawyer [7]
Answer: The Sadducees refused to go beyond the written Torah (first five books of the Bible) and thus, unlike the Pharisees, denied the immortality of the soul, bodily resurrection after death, and the existence of angelic spirits.
6 0
3 years ago
How did the war go from an internal problem in Austria to a world war ?
lesya [120]

Answer:

Lots of people got involved

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What happened when the Federal Reserve limited the money supply?
Yanka [14]

The correct answer is: "The limited access to currency stifled business growth."

When the money supply is limited, there is scarcity in the money market and the interest rate (the price of money) rises. Therefore, through this price adjustment, equilibrum is reached in the market again.

High interest rates disincentivate investment because<u> borrowing funds to finance new projects has become relatively more expensive. Therefore, businesses will not conduct expansion policies</u> under this scenario.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Anti-Federalists were against having a strong government dominated by what group? (short answer 2 questions) 20 points (I'll
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The anti federalists were against having a strong government dominated by the rich. The plan of the federalists were to have only rich people in power because they were the only ones fit to rule. The anti federalists did not want that to happen because that would mean that they would not listen to the majority of the people which are farmers

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did black panthers “ten point program” call for
    6·2 answers
  • ILL MAKE YOU BRAINLIEST IF U ANSWER CORRECTLY!
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following controlled the economy of the Byzantine Empire?
    6·1 answer
  • What happened to the US economy after WW1
    13·1 answer
  • The Proclamation of 1763 was designed mainly to
    10·2 answers
  • Which southern state was the last to be readmitted to the Union?
    10·2 answers
  • A map showing just the outlines of Asia Africa and Europe would probably be used to show A.Streams and rivers B. State capitals
    10·1 answer
  • What do the following phrases suggest about Beveridge’s view of Americans as compared with people of other nations?
    13·1 answer
  • In Congress, each state gets two Senators in the Senate and Representatives in the House of Representatives based on population.
    9·1 answer
  • "you've been warned" "your question has been deleted"<br> UHh WAS THAT A THREAT BRAINLY??
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!