What was an argument of republicans against the league of nations?

History

2 answers:

sweet [91]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

it would draw the united states into conflicts all over the world

Explanation:

kiruha [24]3 years ago

4 0

The anti-imperialists were against wars and most importantly non-contiguous territory or people with different language or culture. The United States joined the race for empire once they declared war with Spain. As a result of entering war with Spain, the anti-imperialists spoke out. The anti-imperialists believed that the United States would struggle to uphold the Declaration of Independence as an empire. Moreover, anti-imperialists supported the old beliefs of what the core of America was built on such as self government, a combination of laws that helped everyone and freedom. The Anti-imperialist League led by William Sumner opposed the occupation of the Philippines during the Spanish-American war. Anti-imperialism instigated in the late 19 th century and the early 20 th century in disagreement to the United States taking over the Philippines. Anti-imperialists argued that the annexation of the Philippines violated the constitutional precept of government through the consent of the governed.

You might be interested in

In the 1980s, the US worked with neighboring countries to end the drug trafficking out of __________; by the 2000s, the fight ha

djyliett [7]

A. Colombia... Mexico

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The answer the question

Tomtit [17]

Answer:

13 states

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Unique 1800s explorer problems

FrozenT [24]

Answer:

In the 1800s, the explorers who were mapping territories and claiming them for their respective nations had some complications and problems specific to their time, such as the lack of communication and transportation technology, which limited the possibility of explorers to travel to certain places. territories and to communicate with each other and with their respective governments.

Therefore, these explorers had to fend for themselves during their travels, both in exploration and in dealing with various dangers and problems during their travels.

3 0

3 years ago

What was the doctrine of nullification?

andreyandreev [35.5K]

<u>The doctrine of nullification:</u>

The Doctrine of Nullification clarified the idea that a state has the option to dismiss government law. The most popular proclamation of the hypothesis of invalidation during this period, composed by John C. Calhoun, was the South Carolina Exposition and Protest of 1828.

Calhoun attested that the Tariff of 1828, which supported the northern assembling states and hurt the southern rural states, was unlawful. The Doctrine of Nullification states dwelling inside the Union has the one-sided, innate (characteristic, undocumented) right to void any law made by the government that could be considered unlawful.

The protected hypothesis that maintained the privilege of states to invalidate government acts inside their limits.

7 0

4 years ago

Which group most strongly supported limiting Chinese immigration in the late-nineteenth century? A.)Knights of Labor B.) Tammany

Reptile [31]

The correct answer for this question is this one: "B.) Tammany Hall"

The group that most strongly supported limiting Chinese immigration in the late-nineteenth century is <u>Tammany Hall</u>
Hope this helps answer your question and have a nice day ahead.

4 0

3 years ago