Answer:
<em>COLUMBIAN EXCHANGE</em>
<em>COLUMBIAN EXCHANGESections & Media</em>
<em>COLUMBIAN EXCHANGESections & MediaHomeSciencePlants</em>
<em>COLUMBIAN EXCHANGESections & MediaHomeSciencePlantsColumbian Exchange</em>
<em>COLUMBIAN EXCHANGESections & MediaHomeSciencePlantsColumbian Exchangeecology</em>
<em>COLUMBIAN EXCHANGESections & MediaHomeSciencePlantsColumbian ExchangeecologyCite Share More</em>
<em>COLUMBIAN EXCHANGESections & MediaHomeSciencePlantsColumbian ExchangeecologyCite Share MoreBY J.R. McNeill View Edit History</em>
<em>COLUMBIAN EXCHANGESections & MediaHomeSciencePlantsColumbian ExchangeecologyCite Share MoreBY J.R. McNeill View Edit HistoryFULL ARTICLE</em>
<em>COLUMBIAN EXCHANGESections & MediaHomeSciencePlantsColumbian ExchangeecologyCite Share MoreBY J.R. McNeill View Edit HistoryFULL ARTICLEColumbian Exchange, the largest part of a more general process of biological globalization that followed the transoceanic voyaging of the 15th and 16th centuries. Ecological provinces that had been torn apart by continental drift millions of years ago were suddenly reunited by oceanic shipping, particularly in the wake of Christopher Columbus’s voyages that began in 1492. The consequences profoundly shaped world history in the ensuing centuries, most obviously in the Americas, Europe, and Africa. The phrase “the Columbian Exchange” is taken from the title of Alfred W. Crosby’s 1972 book, which divided the exchange into three categories: diseases, animals, and plants.</em>
Answer:
Technology affects the way individuals communicate, learn, and think. It helps society and determines how people interact with each other on a daily basis. ... We are living in an era where technological advances are common. The internet and cell phones are some examples
Explanation:
Aha, go-og-le got me messed me ✨✨✨
Answer:
The Answer is D. "...a person or group of people who gain too much power can start making decisions that don't benefit all of society"
Explanation:
This answer pretty much explains exactly why separation of powers was necessary in order to ensure that no one branch can take absolute control of a country or have the most power.
John Julius Norwich makes a point of saying in the introduction to his history of the popes that he is “no scholar” and that he is “an agnostic Protestant.” The first point means that while he will be scrupulous with his copious research, he feels no obligation to unearth new revelations or concoct revisionist theories. The second means that he has “no ax to grind.” In short, his only agenda is to tell us the story. Norwich declares that he is an agnostic Protestant with no axe to grind: his aim is to tell the story of the popes, from the Roman period to the present, covering them neither with whitewash nor with ridicule. Even more disarmingly, he insists that he has no pretensions to scholarship and writes only for “the average intelligent reader”. But he adds: “I have tried to maintain a certain lightness of touch.” And that, it seems, is the opening through which a fair amount of outrageous anecdote and Gibbonian dry wit is allowed to enter the narrative.
