The railway engineers always leave a small gap between two rails to compensate for the expansion of the rails
Looking at cash flow an important step in a good financial plan due to the following reasons:
- To determine areas in business that needs scaling back on spending.
- To monitor the amount of money being received.
<h3>What is a
cash inflow?</h3>
A cash inflow can be defined as an amount of money that flows into a business firm.
<h3>What is a statement of cash flows?</h3>
A statement of cash flows is also referred to as cash flow statement and it can be defined as a financial statement which illustrate how changes in income and various account of the balance sheet affect cash and other cash equivalents.
As a general rule in business management, looking at cash flow an important step in a good financial plan due to the following reasons:
- To determine areas in business that needs scaling back on spending.
- To monitor the amount of money being received.
Read more on cash flows here: brainly.com/question/24299919
#SPJ1
The statement that explains such a relationship is that as the percent of woodland increases, the number of deer observed in a group decreases quickly at first and then more slowly
- Nonlinear relationship is a type of relationship that changes that takes place in the output change not in direct proportion to alterations (changes) in any of the inputs.
- This type of relationship does not produce any straight line but produces a curve line.
- Negative relationship is simply known as negative or inverse correlation that occurs between two variables. That is when that one variable increases, the other decreases, and vice-versa. As in the case of the woodland and the beer. When woodland increases, the deer decreases and vice versa
Conclusively, we can say that as the statement that explains such a relationship is that as the percent of woodland increases, the number of deer observed in a group decreases quickly at first and then more slowly
Learn more from:
brainly.com/question/18101129
The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
