All categories

4 years ago

Grasping a dilemma by the horns means:

2 answers:

8 0

Grasping a dilemma by the horns means <span>proving the dilemma unsound by proving the conjunctive premise false. Although refuting dilemmas refers to proving that the argument is invalid and unsound, if they are valid grasping a dilemma by the horns means to prove that it is unsound. </span>

jarptica [38.1K]4 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Grasping a dilemma by the horns means proving the dilemma unsound by proving the conjunctive premise false. It is used in a condition to refute dilemmas and to make your argument successful. Refuting valid dilemmas will give you a successful argument which is both valid and sound. Grasping a dilemma by the horns is used to show that one of the premises is false.

Explanation:

In a common argument forms and fallacies, we can refute dilemmas. We can do this by grasping the dilemma by the horns. Since a successful must be sound and valid, if we want to reject a valid dilemma, we have to reject one of the premises. Since both of the premises are true, we have to make one of them unsound. Thus, we can reject one of the dilemmas. We have to show that one of the conjuncts in dilemmas is false. Dilemma itself has two premises; conjunction and disjunction. In rejecting the premise, we have to show that the conjunction is not true.

Learn more:

if you are interested in knowing more about dilemma, you can click the link bellow:

1. Ethical dilemma: brainly.com/question/13015186

2. Moral dilemma: brainly.com/question/1236365

Keyword: dilemma, grasping a dilemma by the horns

Subject: Business

Class: College

Subchapter: Refuting dilemma

You might be interested in

During the recent recession, several European countries proposed austerity measures that would help shrink the size of the nati

antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer: Option A

Explanation:

In Europe during the recession the policy rate of the banks like LIBOR and EURIBOR etc were already very close to zero so unlike United states of america they were not able to decrease the rate further. The monetary policy of Europian banks and authorities saw a major failure in that period.

7 0

4 years ago

When organizations face a turbulent environment, intense competition, and the need to move fast, the most appropriate leadership

konstantin123 [22]

When organizations face a turbulent environment, intense competition, and the need to move fast, the most appropriate leadership would be: transactional subordinate centered free rein transformational task-centered.

<h3>How can an organization attend to turbulent environment, intense competition?</h3>

For an to respond to turbulent environment, intense competition, then the kind of leadership needed is transformational task-centered that would be able to observe the business environment to make necessary decision.

Learn more about the leadership at brainly.com/question/25927714

#SPJ1

6 0

2 years ago

The city of Tustin, California, has spent $10 million on a project to build a new community college. It will cost the city $40 m

Irina18 [472]

Answer:

The correct answer is A

Explanation:

Sunk cost is the cost which is incurred by an entity and that can no longer be recovered. It is that cost which is not considered when making the decision to continue investing in the online project as it cannot be recovered.

In this case, city of Tustin incurred $10 million on the project for building a new community college and further it require $40 million to finish the project. The economist told the city council to ignore $10 million because it is a sunk cost which cannot be recovered.

5 0

3 years ago

n a bicycle race with a $5,000 prize for the winner, a cyclist was leading by a significant margin. A spectator at the race was

Lyrx [107]

Answer: intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Explanation:

In order for an individual to be able to make a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, it is required that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant intentionally acted recklessly or caused emotional distress to the person. In this case, there no evidence that an emotional distress was suffered.

Therefore, the theory that the cyclist is least likely to recover maximum punitive damages is intentional infliction of emotional distress.

4 0

3 years ago

Once lower-order needs are satisfied, it is difficult to predict which higher-order needs will motivate behavior.

Levart [38]

Two basic needs categories:

<span>1. </span>Lower-Order needs- this includes safety, physiological requirements.

<span>2. </span>Higher-Order needs- under this category are belongingness, affiliation, accomplishments, esteem, self-actualization, influence (power).

The lower-order needs must be met for higher-order needs to have a long lasting effect on satisfaction. Once lower-order needs are satisfied, it's difficult for managers to predict which higher-order needs will motivate behavior. (TRUE)

3 0

3 years ago