Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.
Explanation:
In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.
Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.
It’s a sentence. Even tho it’s smaller, the sentence makes sense and it doesn’t feel like something is missing. It has all the parts to make a sentence:)
Two specific ways in which Dimmesdale foils Hester are:
- Where she is strong, he is weak
- Where she is shamed publicly - he is honored publicly
<h3>What is Puritanism?</h3>
This refers to the religious sect that rebelled against the English Monarchy and broke out to become independent and had certain beliefs that were aligned with that of Christ.
Hence, we can see that based on the beliefs of Hawthorne, he is said to be a transcendentalist and as such does not believe in the Puritan ways of self-denial and predestination.
Read more about Puritans here:
brainly.com/question/316568
#SPJ1
