What would happen if members of parliament were paid to serve the government?

1 answer:

5 0

If the Members of Parliament (MPs) were paid to serve the government they would be bound to approve of all the actions taken by the executive branch of the government. This is not what is intended in a parliamentary democracy. Here the MPs are intended to be representatives of the people in the constituency from which they have won an election from. So, it naturally follows that the MPs are paid to serve the people by legislating laws in the parliament and by acting as a check to make sure that the decisions of the government reflects the will of the people.

You might be interested in

filipino A.mula sa ibinigay na salita sa ibaba ibigay ang kahulugan ng mga salita batay sa kayarian ng salitang kinabibilangan.

Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Why do Chinese have such a strong influence on Taiwan's culture PLEASSSE HURRY

pochemuha

Because in both Chinese and Taiwan culture their beliefs of honor and respect are important to them.
Example: Respect for elders and loyalty toward the family are considered vital or mandatory.
I’m not sure if this will help but I hope it does!

6 0

3 years ago

Read the excerpt from The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone by James Cross Giblin.

Sladkaya [172]

Answer:

Champollion knew that inscriptions on cartouches were often the names of famous leaders.

Explanation:

none

4 0

3 years ago

According to the theory of social facilitation, a professional boxer is ________ likely to knock out an opponent in a crowded ar

Pavlova-9 [17]

The answer is more because according to the definition of the theory of social facilitation, social facilitation is the tendency for people who are being watched or observed to perform better than they would alone on simple tasks (or tasks they know how to do very well due to repetition).

Answer: more

7 0

3 years ago

Chinese Americans fought the measures and restrictions put upon them through legal and illegal means. Match the state and Suprem

gavmur [86]

Answer:

This question is incomplete. It is missing names and descriptions of the court cases descriptions that are needed to be matched. Here they are (correctly matched):

Tape v. Hurley: The California Supreme Court forced San Francisco to admit Chinese students into public schools.

This case ended in March 1885, with the Supreme Court decision that refusal to admit a Chinese American student Mamie Tape to the all-white Spring Valley School was unlawful. This was a landmark court case.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark: The Supreme Court ruled the Fourteenth Amendment awarded citizenship to children of Chinese immigrants born on American soil.

This case was decided on March 28, 1898, with the Supreme Court ruling that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco in 1873 to Chinese couple, was unlawfully denied entry to the United States after his trip abroad.

Yick Wo v. Hopkins: The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the city of San Francisco to grant licenses to Chinese laundries.

This case was decided on May 10, 1886, with the Supreme Court ruling that the administration of law in a discriminating manner is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In particular, here out of 200 applications, only one permit to operate a wooden building laundry was granted to a Chinese owner, while all non-Chinese owners always received permits.

6 0

3 years ago