Which factor most influenced the southern way of life?

History

2 answers:

RoseWind [281]3 years ago

8 0

c.• Most crops were tended with slave labor. good luck. :)

Mashcka [7]3 years ago

7 0

The correct option is: "Most crops were tended with slave labor."

Of the 8,289,782 free people who lived in the 15 slave states, 393,967 people (4.8%) had slaves, which means that the average owner had about ten slaves. Most slaves were owned by plantation owners, who are defined by historians as those who had twenty or more slaves. Ninety-five percent of the black people lived in the South, representing a third of the population of that region, by comparison in the North zone the black people only represented 2% of its population. The work of the slaves was an important factor in the accumulation of wealth in the United States in the first half of the 19th century.

You might be interested in

Did Fort Donelson battle have a impact on the outcome of the civil war? If so how?

Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

The Battle of Fort Donelson was an early battle in the American Civil War (1861-1865). The success of this battle opened the Tennessee River to Union shipping.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which statement best describes government power in the Soviet Union during the Cold War?

frozen [14]

Answer:

It was limited by the government

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

English general during the French and Indian War

Ganezh [65]

Major General Edward Braddock.

3 0

3 years ago

Do the actions taken against the armenians seem like acceptable wartime actions?

Rashid [163]

Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.

7 0

2 years ago

What are 2 causes of the french revolution and why were they significant?

Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

What are 2 causes of the french revolution and why were they significant?

Explanation:

Although scholarly debate continues about the exact causes of the Revolution, the following reasons are commonly adduced: (1) the bourgeoisie resented its exclusion from political power and positions of honour; (2) the peasants were acutely aware of their situation and were less and less willing to support the ..

Hope that helped.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers