Hello,
The Declaration of Independence is organized into several sections, each serving a different purpose. There are generally considered to be five parts of the Declaration of Independence, according to the National Archives' description on its website. But many persons have critiqued the document and some feel that there are any number of different parts. In view of the discrepancy on what, in one sense, is just a matter of opinion depending on the person giving it, I will go with the National Archives' opinion and leave it to readers to form their own opinions. The parts are: 1. The Introduction. This is the opening paragraph; a single sentence beginning with "We the People..." It is sometime erroneously single sentence beginning with "We the People..." It is sometime erroneously Constitution is referred to as the Preamble to the Constitution. 2. The Preamble. The second paragraph, which begins with "We hold theses truths to be self-evident. The Preamble sets the logic al argument that people have rights, that people form governments to secure those rights and when a government becomes destructive of those rights, the people have a right and a duty to throw off that government. 3. The Indictment of King George III. The list of wrongs the King has done to show the ways in which the King has abused the rights of the King has done to show the ways in which the King has abused the rights of announcing not only the separation of colonial government from British <span>government, but colonial people from British people.
</span>
Well im going to stop here I think you get the idea and you can summarize it
World war 2, most men were off fighting in the war, women had to stand up and take men’s old occupations/jobs in the workplace
The Soviet Union . Cuba was saved from a U.S invasion which was Moscows principal strategic goal, along with the preserving the Castro regime.
Answer: It could be D. I hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Take some of the hard to explain passages in the Bible (or some contradictions).
Those who have faith don't need to know what the passage means at all. They accept what is part of their faith as all that matters. If they don't understand something, they believe that if they leave it alone or pray about, eventually the meaning will become clear. And if it never does, then God will reveal it perhaps after death. It doesn't matter.
To someone without faith, the meaning will never be clear even if one is offered. They can't accept it because their understanding will not permit them to care about whatever it is that seems unclear. To them it does not matter because the premise that religion is built on is false. No answer can bridge that gap.
I hope I'm being fair to both sides. I have faith so if you get a better answer from those who do not, then their explanation is the one you should accept.
