1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mila [183]
3 years ago
11

In the case of Plessy vs Ferguson, the supreme court focused its decision on the interpretation of what word

History
1 answer:
ad-work [718]3 years ago
5 0

The word focused on was:

<h2>Equal</h2>

In context, the overall phrase focused on was the concept of "<u>separate but equal.</u>"

Explanation/details:

Homer Plessy is the man behind the famous Supreme Court case, Plessy v. Ferguson.  The state of Louisiana had passed a law in 1890, segregating blacks from whites on public transportation.  In 1892, Plessy, who was 1/8 black, bought a first class train railroad ticket, took a seat in the whites only section, and then informed the conductor that he was part black.  He was removed from the train and jailed.  He argued for his civil rights before Judge John Howard Ferguson and was found guilty.  His case went all the way to the Supreme Court which at that time upheld the idea of "separate but equal" facilities.

Several decades later, Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned.  Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, decided by the US Supreme Court in 1954, extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to education. Until that decision, it was legal to segregate schools according to race, so that black students could not attend the same schools as white students. The older Supreme Court decision, Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which had said that separate but equal facilities were okay, was thus challenged and defeated by Brown v. Board of Education.  Segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.

You might be interested in
How many colonists joined the british army in protest against the rebellion?
jonny [76]
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>

The history of the American Revolution truly starts with the French and Indian War (1754-63), without which no defiance would have occurred when it did. The British assumed control North America toward the finish of the war, administering the district north of Florida and west to the Mississippi River. Investigate the guide above.

Homesteaders wouldn't have parted from Britain on the off chance that despite everything they required their insurance from the French (green), who'd blocked western extension in the Ohio Valley. Americans and Redcoats battled together against the French at the same time, as the maxim goes, recognition breeds disdain, and frontier local armies detested the hatred of their bosses in the British military.

All the more significantly, a few pilgrims didn't feel that they required the British any longer and the populace occupying these developing, asset rich states was for all intents and purposes self-chose for resistance to power, huge numbers of its pioneers having emigrated from the British Isles to look for more noteworthy opportunity.

They bristled under British endeavors to keep them close to the East Coast and squabbled about money-related issues in regards to duties and exchange. By 1763, the time had come to tidy off the Join, or Die. woodcut Ben Franklin had imprinted in 1754 to rally pilgrims in the interest of the British against the French; at the same time, this time, they were reviving against their very own rulers. More than 50,000 took part in the protest.

5 0
4 years ago
The powers not delegated to the United States by the
lesya692 [45]

Answer:

C. To limit the authority of the federal government.

Hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What Sumerian tools were made from bronze
katrin2010 [14]

Answer: Many weapons were made with bronze, including swords, daggers and axes. More advanced weaponry enabled the Sumerians to become a powerful, warring force

5 0
3 years ago
Why did Germany declare war on Belgium even though they were a neutral country?
Alenkinab [10]
Because Belgium was the country in which the Nazis had to march through in order to get to France another way.
3 0
3 years ago
Mixed-market economies have more private property, while command economies have more public property. Which is the best example
bazaltina [42]

Answer: C

Explanation: its the only one that makes sense

9 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • President george w. bush, in eulogizing president reagan, stated when ronald reagan was a child he "knew the world as a place of
    5·1 answer
  • How are jJohnny Appleseed and Paul Bunyan different
    8·1 answer
  • Based on what you know about the Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act, how can tariffs be both useful and dangerous tools? Give your answer i
    9·2 answers
  • What does this Greek vessel (pottery) teach us about the beliefs of the ancient Greeks? Answer In a Paragraph
    13·1 answer
  • It was the war hawks who called for the war/ true or false​
    6·2 answers
  • “This is why the Soviet power is a new form of state organization, different in principle from the old bourgeois-democratic and
    13·1 answer
  • 2) Files are transcribed in:
    8·2 answers
  • Why does it go blurey?
    5·2 answers
  • On the map which feature is identified with the letter w
    9·1 answer
  • What changed for families in the North due to the Industrial Revolution?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!