In which political system do the people rule?

2 answers:

8 0

Since a monarchy is where the royal family rule,an aristocracy is where the noble families rule,<span>an anarchy is where nobody rules so that leaves C.democracy. Hope that helped :)</span>

Solnce55 [7]3 years ago

5 0

Democracy is a type of government ruled by the majority in which all the people have the right to interfere to whatever is the states’ decisions on its affairs. Freedom from press is the freedom of the people to express themselves in media and articles. Its function is to voice out everyone’s opinion onto matters. This is very important because though the people have voted its leaders, the leaders may not see the trivial problems in which ordinary citizens could. However this right must be taken with extreme caution against abuse. <span> </span>

You might be interested in

How were jazz musician Louis Armstrong and playwright Eugene O'Neill alike?

MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

I think the answer is A not 100% sure

Explanation:

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a parliamentarian system of representative democracy, the prime minister

grandymaker [24]

And President is the answer. Right

3 0

3 years ago

What are the Icelandic political parties, and how do they compare to American parties?

lions [1.4K]

Answer:

Eight parties were elected at the October 2017 election. The list of the distribution of seats in the incumbent parliament are

progressive party
Independence party
Centre party
Left-Green Movement
Social Democratic Alliance
Pirate Party
Reform Party
People's Party.

4 0

3 years ago

What is the central idea about dorothea lange: portrait photographer

marin [14]

Answer:

Explanation:More quotes

Summary of Dorothea Lange

Dorothea Lange's images of Depression-era America made her one of the most acclaimed documentary photographers of the 20th century. She is remembered above all for revealing the plight of sharecroppers, displaced farmers and migrant workers in the 1930s, and her portrait of Florence Owens Thompson, Migrant Mother, Nipomo, California(1936), has become an icon of the period. Since much of this work was carried out for a government body, the Farm Security Administration, it has been an unusual test case of American art being commissioned explicitly to drive government policy. After the Depression she went on to enjoy an illustrious career in photo-journalism during its hey-day, working for leading magazines such as Fortune and Life, and traveling widely throughout Asia, Latin America, and Egypt. She was instrumental in assembling the "Family of Man" exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York in 1959, a renowned celebration of struggling post-war humanity.

5 0

4 years ago

Can someone edit this and add more sentences or edit it.. this is about would u rather be a patriot or loyalist. Also can u add

kenny6666 [7]

Answer

i added a few things and deleted some oh and i added a conclusion

Explanation:

both Loyalists and Patriots fought for a similar thing... equality. I would go for the Patriots. Patriots wanted more than equality, they wanted freedom. They no longer wanted to follow British rules, they wanted a change for good. The Patriots wanted everybody to have a different view on the rules, and all agree upon them

Since I am a woman, in 1775 women did not have all the rights we do now. We were practically forced to stay home was not normalized to join workforce, all because of gender. Patriots fought for freedom and equality, including gender equality. So that women would have more juties in society other than wash clothes and tend to their husbands and children. I agree that women should be able to make their own choices and as if for everyone. Freedom is needed for the world to thrive. The patriots believed that freedom was an essential part for their revolution.

I believe in fairness, equality, and most of all, being able to have a choice. I have goals in my life, as everyone does. I wouldn't be able to accomplish my goals without the freedom to do so. The bare necessities. It is unjust that some people would have an upper hand just because of his or her skin color, gender, identification, and financial status. It makes the world unfair and not worth living for. Everyone should be able to enjoy life that the universe has given us.

As a 14 year old girl, life would be hard in 1775, with no freedom, equality, or choice. Many young girls during this time never got the chance to live their lives fully because they were young girls. My financial status isn't at its highest right now, but that is ok, because i know i still have potential. I will be able to work soon and figure out my own problems. Without freedom, equality, and justice, i wouldn't be able to achieve greatness.

In conclusion, I would rather be a patriot so i can keep fighting for my personal greatness I have a lot ahead of me, i can't let a higher being restrict me from crossing my own finish line. I chose freedom., respect, justice. I choose my future.

7 0

3 years ago