It is Lack of education. It is Lack of training. Absence of training is the underlying driver of destitution. A dismal misguided judgment infests our city: that Rochester's urban understudies can't be instructed until the point when we have tackled the issue of neediness. Trusting that poor kids can't learn simply prompts loss of motion. The main driver of neediness is absence of instruction
Answer:
haploid describes a cell that contains a single set of chromosomes in gametes (egg or sperm cells). they contain half of the amount of chromosomes as diploid cells, which are also known as somatic cells
The answer to the question above is this: THE GENERALIZED OTHER. The Generalized Other is actually proposed by <span>George Herbert </span><span>Mead. This is a concept in social science that refers to someone who reacts and behaves based on how other people expects them to be. George Herbert Mead is actually a known American Philosopher and sociologist.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.
Circadian Rhythm? I might be completely wrong
