I manage my screen time by creating new habits and distracting myself from using my cellphone so much. I try working on homework or listening to music, going on runs to the park and helping my mom tiding up the house. Since online classes started my screen time has gone down, I believe it’s because I’ve been paying attention in class and focusing on my school work rather than my phone and social media.
Answer:
The answer is technical reasoning: technical reasoning is the learning pattern that can help ensure that your points are concise (brief: using few words) and succinct. Unlike precision, which is the learning pattern that uses a lot/most words, technical reasoning uses the fewest words—it's concise and succinct, and can help people to think without depending too much on words.
B would be the correct answer :)
it should definitely be two sentences...
1. Thomas was frustrated during class.
2. He forgot his book report.
Answer:
Themes are the fundamental and often universal ideas explored in a literary work.
Explanation:
Given the novel’s title, it is no surprise that courage—defining it, desiring it, and, ultimately, achieving it—is the most salient element of the narrative. As the novel opens, Henry’s understanding of courage is traditional and romantic. He assumes that, like a war hero of ancient Greece, he will return from battle either with his shield or on it. Henry’s understanding of courage has more to do with the praise of his peers than any internal measure of his bravery. Within the novel’s first chapter, Henry recalls his mother’s advice, which runs counter to his own notions. She cares little whether Henry earns himself a praiseworthy name; instead, she instructs him to meet his responsibilities honestly and squarely, even if it means sacrificing his own life.
you welcome!
The line that states, "courage is a man with a gun in his hand." It is a metaphor because Lee is not comparing courage to a man with a gun with "like" or "as." Instead, she uses "is", as if she is enforcing the fact that courage IS a man with a gun. That kind of bluntness is only in a metaphor, as the author gives no room for debate.