The correct answer to this is either generalizing or generalizabilty. Both mean the same and can be used interchangeably. It is basically an ability to generalize something based on a specific finding. It's not only on a broader group though, as it can also be done for its impact on natural environments based on a smaller finding.
Facilitators
Best of luck in your studies! ☺️
Answer:
the ending inventory using the FIFO cost flow assumption is $282,900
Explanation:
The computation of the ending inventory using the FIFO cost flow assumption is shown below;
But before that first we have to determine the ending inventory units i.e.
= 280 + 380 + 480 + 290 - 1,200
= 230 units
So, the ending inventory is
= 230 units × $1,230
= $282,900
Hence, the ending inventory using the FIFO cost flow assumption is $282,900
Answer:
Cheap
Explanation:
If Mary is selling one product at a lower promotional price then the buyer will think the other products are being sold at a lower price too right?
I may be wrong.......
Answer:
(g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Increase in price of typical soda = 10 cents
Total consumed = 150,000 sodas [er day
Dropped quantity = 75,000 sodas
So by considering the above information, the per day compensating variation of the tax varies from 0 and - 7,500
Since the sugar sweetened sodas is treated as a normal goods. Moreover, people can substitute the other goods also if there is an increase in a price of the good
The -7,500 is come from = (-75,000 × 0.10)
The options are as follows
(a) Greater than -$15k because soda is a luxury good with income (b) -$15k because that is the old consumption level times the value of the tax (c) Between -S7.5k and -$15k because soda is a luxury good elasticity > 1 with income elasticity >1 (d) Between -$7.5k arti -$15k because residents can substitute to other products (e) -$7.5k because that is the new consumption level times the value of the tax ()-$7.5k because that is the change in consumption times the value of the tax (g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products (h) Between 0 and -$7.5k because because beverages are typically necessity goods with 6) Nothing because there was no effect on income G) It is impossible to say without knowing consumers' marginal rate of substitution income elasticity less than 1
