The way in which the actions of this unnamed, secondary character reflect Yevgeny’s state of mind in the story is that it highlights the conflict and tension in the story.
<h3>What textual evidence supports the above assertion?</h3>
- "the pacing of a man overhead who, to judge from his nervous step, was “thinking of something harassing.”
- “the inhabitant of the second storey was still pacing from one end of the room to another.”
<h3>Who is secondary character?</h3>
Secondary characters are individuals in our stories who play an important part and appear in several scenes but are not the major plot's focus.
These minor characters may be the center point of their own subplots, making them essential to the overall tale.
Learn more about Secondary characters:
brainly.com/question/20740351
#SPJ1
Oedipus is quick to anger and very proud.
Because of his anger and pride, when he encounters King Laius on a road, he engages in a fight with him and kills him. Had he not killed Laius, Thebes would not have been cursed.
Later, his takes his anger out on the blind prophet, Tiresias, when the prophet does not give him the answers he wants. His pride is insulted when Tiresias suggests Oedipus is to blame.
Because of his anger and his pride, destruction comes to him and those around him.
Answer:
- Question of value.
Explanation:
As per the question, Megan employs a 'question of value' kind of persuasive speech that is inclined towards arguing a specific value to be ethical or unethical, moral or immoral, and determining conclusions accordingly. Such a speech proposes an ethical appeal in order to evoke a judgmental reaction or response from the audience like Megan argues that 'providing similar rights or privileges regardless of the gender, race, sex, etc.' aims to reflect the righteousness of immorality associated with the issue. This ethical argument leads to elicit a morally judgmental response from the audience. Therefore, it exemplifies <u>'question of value'.</u>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
because it's part of power or authority without justification; arrogant and domineering.
