1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
9966 [12]
3 years ago
6

What could be a result of a government not adhering to the rule of law? (Select all that apply.)

History
2 answers:
FromTheMoon [43]3 years ago
8 0
Laws follow clear rules and legal principles and hold people accountable for their behavior
soldi70 [24.7K]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>

The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.

So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.

You might be interested in
What made it difficult for freed African Americans to take advantage of the homestead act?
AysviL [449]

There was a lot of opposition to black people leaving the south because the white planter class did not want to lose their cheap labor if the blacks migrated westwards. They even went to the extent of closing the Mississippi River and intimidating to sink boats carrying the African Americans

8 0
3 years ago
How did European countries react to the Hawley-Smoot Tariff harm American business?
Mila [183]
<span>they imported more American goods
Please mark as brainliest answer!</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which did Sumerians use to sign their names?
emmasim [6.3K]
B.

For those that could not write (So most), they carried a seal around either on a necklace or otherwise that they could use to stamp with ink to signify 'signing' something.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which leader believed religious leaders should be active in politics
UNO [17]

Answer: jerry Falwell

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Prior to reforms in Great Britain, what percent of males were able to vote and elect members of the British Parliament?
xxMikexx [17]
The percentage of males to vote were 80%
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was North Africa of strategic value to the Germans during World War II
    13·3 answers
  • How might the First Nations have reacted when they saw that the Europeans were moving onto their lands and disrupting their way
    10·1 answer
  • LBJ's domestic policies, also known as the Great Society policies,
    10·1 answer
  • Which 19th century American art movement was centered on portraying the beauty of natural landscapes?
    7·2 answers
  • How are the executive powers divided in state governments?
    13·2 answers
  • How did us railroads effect transportation
    8·2 answers
  • The Whiskey Rebellion challenged the idea that -
    15·2 answers
  • What was the major food crop from the Middle Colonies? Fish Corn Wheat Bread
    6·1 answer
  • A person who was born in another country can become a U.S. citizen through
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the launch of sputnik in 1957 important? most in the u.s. had not thought the soviets were capable of producing satellit
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!