1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
9966 [12]
3 years ago
6

What could be a result of a government not adhering to the rule of law? (Select all that apply.)

History
2 answers:
FromTheMoon [43]3 years ago
8 0
Laws follow clear rules and legal principles and hold people accountable for their behavior
soldi70 [24.7K]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>

The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.

So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.

You might be interested in
How did the kennedy administration react to the march on washington? president kennedy asked for public support of civil rights.
katrin2010 [14]

Kennedy administration react to the March on Washington by pushing the Civil Rights Act through Congress and signed it into law.

<h3>What was the March on Washington?</h3>

This was the social march by an approximate of 250,000 people for a peaceful demonstration to promote Civil Rights and economic equality for African Americans.

The Participants of the March on Washington walked down Constitution, Independence avenues and then gathered at the Lincoln Monument for speeches, songs, and prayer.

Because of the social demonstration, President Kennedy pushed the Civil Rights Act through Congress and signed it into law.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.

Read more about March on Washington

brainly.com/question/1621956

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
In what kind of government does a small group have a firm control over a country? A. Monarchy B. Oligarchy C. Totalitarian D. Re
vivado [14]
A small group has a firm control over a country in the kind of government known as B. oligarchy. Monarchy refers to a country which is ruled by a king or queen. Totalitarian society is a regime where the entire system is ruled by a sort of a dictator. Representative democracy is a type of rule where the people elect persons who will represent them in a political body.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which author describes Athens as a place with time for pleasant relaxation?
Elodia [21]
<span>I believe the author is Arthur Ransome</span>
8 0
3 years ago
how did the U.S. feel about expanding the country in the late 1800s, and how was this different from what most European countrie
kompoz [17]

The focus was on expansionism, the United States took little part in foreign affairs for much of the 1800s. Committed to the policy of isolationism, the U.S. declined to intervene in an independence movement in Poland when asked to do so by foreign leaders. 




4 0
3 years ago
How did the Protestant Reformation affect Europe?
babunello [35]

Answer:

Ultimately the Protestant Reformation led to modern democracy, skepticism, capitalism, individualism, civil rights, and many of the modern values we cherish today. The Protestant Reformation increased literacy throughout Europe and ignited a renewed passion for education.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • who was Athenian ruler advanced the cause of democracy by taking steps to allow all citizens to participate in their government.
    13·2 answers
  • Different way public policies are made
    13·1 answer
  • What was a major component of the Schlieffen Plan?
    7·2 answers
  • The Manhattan Project: a) was kept a secret from the entire Executive Branch except President Roosevelt and Vice President Truma
    8·1 answer
  • According to Washington, what impact will
    7·2 answers
  • Theodora was Justinian’s wife and empress but did not advise or help the emperor in any way.
    6·1 answer
  • U.S. government policies of relocation, exploitation, and oppression were systematically exterminating Native Americans during t
    12·1 answer
  • Which factor most contributed to the split among southern Democrats in 1948?
    12·1 answer
  • How did Andrew Jackson feel about the National Bank?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the role of the Committee on Assignments?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!