1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
9966 [12]
3 years ago
6

What could be a result of a government not adhering to the rule of law? (Select all that apply.)

History
2 answers:
FromTheMoon [43]3 years ago
8 0
Laws follow clear rules and legal principles and hold people accountable for their behavior
soldi70 [24.7K]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>

The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.

So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.

You might be interested in
What is the cycle of suffering, according to the Buddha?
BigorU [14]

Answer:

i think the answer the is a and c i dont know

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASEE HELPP !! Which development is Eisenhower trying to warn Americans against?
wariber [46]

Eisenhower tried to warn Americans against the excessive influence on the country of the armed forces and big business.

<h3>Who was Eisenhower?</h3>

Eisenhower was a statesman and American military officer who served as the 34th president of the US from 1953-1961.

During the World War II, he served as the Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe and achieved the five-star rank of General of the Army.

<h3>What is meant by Armed Forces?</h3>

Armed forces refer to the combined military, naval, and air forces of a particular nation.

<h3>What is meant by Business?</h3>

A business is basically defined as an enterprising entity or organization which is basically engaged in industrial , commercial, or professional
activities. Businesses can be for profit entities or non-profit
organizations.

To know more about Eisenhower here:

brainly.com/question/15725432

#SPJ2

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is a sign that a state with constitution is really an authoritarian state
insens350 [35]
An accurate definition of an authoritarian government is when choices of an individual's personal life and public life is greatly interfered and manipulated with, as according to the government's wish. 
<span>   Most of the current governments in countries are authoritarian to some degree or other, only the intensity and extent seems to change. Some of the countries where authoritarian government is very obvious are North Korea, Saudi Arabia, China, and Iran(to a point )</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Why was the Bill of Rights needed for the ratification of the Constitution, and what did the Bill of Rights protect? (Site 1)
Zepler [3.9K]
They needed a bill of rights to persuade people that the federal government would protect their rights. To protect the Liberty of each individual.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Social Security
Marrrta [24]
B) Entitlement Programs
— if you need more info it is payed by United States tax payers
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the 1600s and 1700s, European plantations in the West Indies
    6·2 answers
  • The early followers of Islam, Judaism, and Christianity all believed that Jesus was the son of God.
    6·2 answers
  • Which action during the 1930s heightened the tensions between japan and the united states?
    6·1 answer
  • In the electoral college, what formula was utilized to set the number of electors?
    15·1 answer
  • How did the u.s government respond to the events of september 11,2001?
    10·2 answers
  • What is his attitude toward each?
    8·2 answers
  • 2. What would a supporter of the French Enlightenment most likely deem the path to progress?
    14·1 answer
  • I'll give brainiest if you correct!
    13·1 answer
  • in what ways does the United States Constitution show the principles of both republican and democratic
    10·1 answer
  • How do the Chinese people view Western culture compared to how the Chinese government views it?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!