1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PIT_PIT [208]
2 years ago
10

Is illiteracy negative or positive word

History
2 answers:
jok3333 [9.3K]2 years ago
6 0
I believe illiteracy is a negative word. This is because it means unable to read or write. It also means not knowledgeable. This is not a positive thing. When someone is illiterate, it usually means they are not educated and not informed.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong :)
Vedmedyk [2.9K]2 years ago
4 0
Illiteracy is a negative word
You might be interested in
1. deride possessing enough cash to meet debts or expenses 2. lambaste to beg or borrow things without being able to pay them ba
elena-s [515]

1. deride: to put down or show contempt for a person

2. lambaste : to strongly criticize a person over decisions that have been made

3. scrounge : to beg or borrow things without being                      

able to pay them back

4. solvent : possessing enough cash to meet debts or expenses

3 0
3 years ago
Check the statements that are true about Francis Drake: (MORE THAN ONE)
ELEN [110]

All of them are correct


8 0
2 years ago
An ethnic group originally from somewhere north of China (perhaps western Manchuria), which subsequently spread through migratio
Kamila [148]

is this just a comment. I don't see a question

8 0
2 years ago
Please help!
Arlecino [84]
Differences
North India - landlocked
South India - Long coastlines
North India involved in wars and invasions,
South India - Little war was able to protect culture
North India - De urbanized
South India - Urbanized
8 0
3 years ago
Why the Union army had better results using army chaplains than the Confederate army.
vitfil [10]
<span>The work of chaplains during the Civil War has, until recent years, been overlooked by many historians and scholars. While the more general topic of religion’s role during the war has been thoroughly researched and written about, the more specific role of the men involved in the work of ministering to soldiers has not received quite as much attention. The impact religion had on Civil War soldiers would never have been as pervasive were it not for the dedicated work of chaplains. Whether these men were Protestant preachers (the vast majority), Catholic priests, or Jewish rabbis, the influence of those who served in the capacity of chaplain was as definite as it was long lasting. Fortunately, a growing number of scholars are now recognizing and writing about the influence of Civil War chaplains, as a recent study attests:</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which part of the Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the government?
    5·2 answers
  • In what two ways were the Crusades considered successful?
    15·2 answers
  • Who won the Battle of Princeton? The Americans or the British.
    10·2 answers
  • Who were often the only ones who knew how to read and write in the Early-High Middle Ages? *
    13·1 answer
  • According to John Locke, what did members of a society have the right to do when their rights were not protected?
    14·1 answer
  • Why might someone argue that government is not necessary in the United States? Provide at least one reason why a person might ta
    11·2 answers
  • How were the government and religion of vietnam affected by outside influences ?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was Sherman's "total war" a major change from earlier forms of<br> fighting?
    10·1 answer
  • What did historian Frederick Jackson Turner claim in 1893?
    5·1 answer
  • What did John Winthrop mean when he described the Massachusetts Bay Colony as a "city upon a hill"?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!