Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
It is very important for consumers to carefully analyze the information being presented in advertisements. The reason for this is because advertisements tend to leave out the negatives in an advertisement since their goal is to persuade you into buying their product.
Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Answer:
16. y. Gibbons V Ogden
Explanation:
"This Supreme Court decision forbade states from enacting any legislation that would interfere with Congress's right to regulate commerce among the separate states." -From the National Archives
This decision was following the invention of the Steamboat by Robert Fulton
Plessy v. Ferguson- basically Louisiana passed a law saying the black people need it separate car when traveling on train not on the same as a white person.
Plessy was 1/8 African descent (was born free and other 7/8 was of European descent ) and under Louisiana rule he had to sit on a black car. eventually he sat on white only car and got into trouble, just like Rosa Parks. and he was eventually got arrested and tried.
