Answer:
No, a new state law overrules a federal law is not permitted. According to the constitution the law made under the authority of the United States , shall be the supreme law of the land. As a result of this all federal laws overrules the state laws, judges in every state are bound by the federal laws irrespective of what the state laws state. The federal government can pass laws that affect every state, state government obey treaties signed by the federal government and any new federal law will force the state to change Its existing laws.
Explanation:
Access to food, water, shelter, and all basic human needs can hinder or help the growth of a civilization. Civilizations with similar environments or climates tend to develop on similar paths (because they run into the same problems/conveniences that have to be solved by human brains, which are wired to react to certain situations in certain ways.)
The North won most of the battles but there was a few little wins for the south
A is true, B is true and C is false
hope it helps.
No one, not even he could have averted the war without a historical wrong that could no longer be justified in a democracy - the continuation of legal human bondage in the United States. But to answer the question. Yes, I think it was very possible that no guns had to fire, and it would have been to me a revolting development.
