Well I can try to pump something out quickly.
There are many <em>different</em> ways to choose a book to read. First, you could ask for recommendations from your friends and aquaintences. Just don't ask Aunt Washma, she only reads <em>uninteresting</em> books with <em>shirt</em> ripping goddesses on the cover. If your friends and family are no help, try checking out the <em>book</em> review in the <em>Chica</em><em>go</em> times. If the <em>reads</em><em> </em>featured there are too <em>bold</em><em> </em>for your taste, try something a little more low carminative. Like R: The Ronaldo Magazine or <em>Animals</em><em> </em>Magazine. You could also choose a book the <em>old</em><em> </em>fashioned way, head to your local library or <em>book</em><em> </em><em>fair</em><em> </em>and browse until something catches your eyes. Or, you could save yourself a whole lot of <em>dumb</em> trouble and log on to www.bookish.com, the <em>amazing</em><em> </em>new website to <em>scan</em><em> </em>for books! With all the time you'll save not having to search for <em>hardcovers</em>, you can read two more books!
The option that describes a deconstructionist approach to a text is - complicate the meaning of the text.
Deconstructionists like to dig very deep into the text, and find meanings that aren't obvious at the first, second, or even the third glance. They like to analyze texts to such an extent that they bare everything within their interpretation, and get to the very core of the text, thus complicating something that would otherwise have been a simple analysis.