Answer:
O Anaya structures his excerpt as an analysis, while Nye structures her excerpt as an observation.
Explanation:
In the first excerpt, Rudolfo Anaya presents a case of his friend who decided to 'remove' his heritage, his Latin background just to get accepted for a scholarship. And in this act, Anaya observes that his friend <em>"took out his native language, the poetic patois of our reality . . . took the soul out of his poetry." </em>This shows his analysis of what he saw and thinks is happening, giving his opinion.
On the other hand, Naomi Shihab Nye structures "Speaking Arabic" as an observation of what she saw. She describes the young man's declaration of wanting a heritage among the <em>"tall America trees"</em> while in a Texas fair in between the <em>"German Oom-pah Sausage Stand and the Mexican Gorditas booth".</em> The excerpt is an observation of what she saw at that time and place.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is that Anaya structures his excerpt as an analysis while Nye's is an observation.
</u>
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
The statement here is a plain sentence without any logical backing or support.
For any argument to be reasonable or adequate, three factors are essential
a) Definition
b) Deductive reasoning
c) Inductive reasoning.
The given statement has a valid sentence but does not have any logical support (though it is correct)
Hence, option A is correct
Horses live to be twenty years old.
(false, horses live 25-32 statistically.)
This would be Descriptive writing.
