Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
The principal duhhh dumb add jhit
<h2>Jill's interest in the property will: <u>Pass to Jill's heirs </u>(Option B)</h2>
Explanation:
Let us understand the meaning of tenancy: It is the "possession of any property which might be land or building and get connected as tenant".
In contrast, ownership means the property belongs that person alone or in partnership.
Understanding the above terms, We can say, Jack and Jill have been a tenant and after ten years, Jill dies. So the rest of the interest in the property will definitely go to his heirs only.
It cannot be passed to Jack because Jill's interest will not be paid by other person except for Jill's heirs. Jack heirs are no way responsible or own the property of Jack.
I don’t really know I just need points
The firm is probably at its early stages of development, and is struggling to break even.
