This equation is equal to 5*4 so it equals 20
The cost of parking is an initial cost plus an hourly cost.
The first hour costs $7.
You need a function for the cost of more than 1 hour,
meaning 2, 3, 4, etc. hours.
Each hour after the first hour costs $5.
1 hour: $7
2 hours: $7 + $5 = 7 + 5 * 1 = 12
3 hours: $7 + $5 + $5 = 7 + 5 * 2 = 17
4 hours: $7 + $5 + $5 + $5 = 7 + 5 * 3 = 22
Notice the pattern above in the middle column.
The number of $5 charges you add is one less than the number of hours.
For 2 hours, you only add one $5 charge.
For 3 hours, you add two $5 charges.
Since the number of hours is x, according to the problem, 1 hour less than the number of hours is x - 1.
The fixed charge is the $7 for the first hour.
Each additional hour is $5, so you multiply 1 less than the number of hours,
x - 1, by 5 and add to 7.
C(x) = 7 + 5(x - 1)
This can be left as it is, or it can be simplified as
C(x) = 7 + 5x - 5
C(x) = 5x + 2
Answer: C(x) = 5x + 2
Check:
For 2 hours: C(2) = 5(2) + 2 = 10 + 2 = 12
For 3 hours: C(3) = 5(3) + 2 = 15 + 2 = 17
For 4 hours: C(3) = 5(4) + 2 = 20 + 2 = 22
Notice that the totals for 2, 3, 4 hours here
are the same as the right column in the table above.
Answer:
-9/13
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for slope is [ y2-y1/x2-x1 ].
10-(-3)/-5-4
13/-9
-9/13
Best of Luck!
Answer:
August=$350
September=$560
October=$210
November= $280
Step-by-step explanation:
Total amount left to save $1400.
We calculate the amount save each mount since we are already given the percentages.
For the month of August she saves 25% of $1400, we convert the percentage to equivalent cash

for the month of August, she saved $350,
Next For the month of September she saves 40% of $1400, we convert the percentage to equivalent cash

for the month of September, she saved $560,
Next For the month of October she saves 15% of $1400, we convert the percentage to equivalent cash

for the month of October, she saved $210,
total amount saved by October = $350+$560+$210=$1120
Amount saved by November=1400-1120=$280
<h2><u>
Answer with explanation:</u></h2>
Let p be the proportion of voters in a certain state support an increase in the minimum wage.
As per given , we have

Since alternative hypothesis is right-tailed so the test is a right-tailed test.
Test statistic : 
, where n= sample size.
p= population proportion.
= sample proportion.
. In a random sample of 300 fast food workers for 240 supporters increase an minimum-wage.
i.e. n= 300 and 
Then,

For significant level α = .05 , the critical z-value is

Decision : Since calculated z-value (3.78) is greater than the critical value (1.645) , so we reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion : We have sufficient evidence o support researcher's claim that that the percentage of fast food workers for support and increase is higher than 70%..