The Cold War's "hottest" moment was likely the Cuban missile crisis. It became the closest the world has ever been to a nuclear war and devastation between the United States and the USA. It also evolved into a famous illustration of non-lethal conflict brinkmanship.
<h3>What effects did the Cuban Missile Crisis have on relatives who grew up during the Cold War?</h3>
However, the non-violent conflict and nuclear arms race were far from done. In actuality, the crisis' other lasting effect was to persuade the Soviet Union to increase
its investment in an intercontinental ballistic missile arsenal that could reach the United States from Soviet soil.
Read more about the Cuban missiles
brainly.com/question/523941
#SPJ1
The main reason for rapid growth of labor unions in the late 1800s was the Industrial Revolution, which brought an unprecedented amount of workers into dangerous factory conditions.
Answer:
A
Explanation: ancient Egypt was located northeast of Africa
Answer:
In Federalist No. 34 Alexander Hamilton, arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution, claimed that the Roman Republic had “attained to the utmost height of human greatness.”1 The Roman Republic, at least an idealized version, was explicitly the model that the founding fathers looked to when developing their own democratic constitution. By and large, this model has succeeded in establishing a stable democracy. American success and the subsequent global proliferation of democratic regimes in the twentieth century have made the triumph of democracy, with its roots in Ancient Rome, a persuasive narrative. However, this raises an important question: how democratic was the Roman Republic?
Evaluating the Roman Republic’s constitution and how it was applied in theory and practice it becomes clear that the Roman Republic, while constitutionally quite democratic, was in practice a fundamentally undemocratic society, dominated by a select caste of wealthy aristocrats. This can be seen both through the structure of ‘democratic’ institutions and the power to make war and peace in the Roman Republic.
To properly understand how democratic the Roman Republic was, it is necessary to first understand how ancient scholars understood democracy as a political system. One can find a cohesive answer in the writings of the 2nd century Greek historian, and Roman captive, Polybius. According to Polybius, democracy is “where reverence to the gods, succor of parents, respect to elders, and obedience to laws are traditional and habitual…in such communities, if the will of the majority prevail, we may speak of the…government as a democracy.” 2 Polybius also details how democracy emerges from other political systems. Out of the state of nature, kings emerge as rulers. Over time kingship becomes hereditary and tyrannical and is overthrown by aristocratic plot; “but it is not long before the [minds of the people] roused…their fall therefore was very like the disaster which befell the tyrants.”3 Consequently, “[the people] are driven to take refuge in…a democracy…they regard their current constitution as a blessing and hold equality and freedom the utmost value.”4 Through his description Polybius provides a criteria through which to assess the Roman Republic as a democracy.
Answer:
B. Economic differences .
Explanation:
Emiliano Zapata is one of the most important figures of the Mexican Revolution which began in 1910. One of Zapata´s main demands was a fair agrarian reform that would redistribute the land amongst peasants so that they could own the products of their labor, seeking more just economic relations between the ruling and powerful class and the working class. Thanks to Zapata´s efforts, the Mexican constitution of 1917 included an important article that aimed at actually redistributing the land amongst peasants, lands that would adopt the name of “hejidos” and which, to this day, are still owned by the workers of the land.
