during times of war The two that I know most about are his suspension of Habeas Corpus and then his issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation. On the first issue, people will often discuss that Lincoln unlawfully suspended the writ of habeas corpus during the war thus violating American Constitutional rights.
The right answer is more than likely C because because the British had an inexperienced army. Although the British did inflict significant causalities to the army it was a clear victory for the Americans.
<span>it exerted pressure on the new Obama administration to do something about the crisis
</span>
It is one of the media success stories of performing its role as both an informer and channel for pressurizing governments and those in authority to commit to the public good. These has been identified as one of the most important media roles in a democracy.
<span></span>
Answer:
I think the answers are
A. A state can keep ships of war in time of peace.
D. A state can enter into any agreement with a foreign power
B. A state can engage in war
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
B is debatable because A state can't engage in a war without the consent of congress unless it is being invaded or in danger.
Answer:
All three asked question are discussed deeply and extensively below in details specially Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu and international community pressure on South African government, against the end of apartheid.
Explanation:
Nelson Mandela peacefully protested to terminate apartheid. he was imprisoned for 27 years for such treason. thousands of other South-African specially non whites were imprisoned and some were even executive for their resistance against apartheid.
Desmond Tutu contribute in Mandela's effort through led economic fight against the end of apartheid. he called for an economic boycott of his country, organised peaceful marches.
South African government was criticized on apartheid widely by both western nations and the United Nation. and protest were held in many countries.
