War on the Western Front from late 1914 to most of 1918 can be characterized as a stalemate during which little ground was gained. Thus, Option 1 is the correct choice.
<h3>What is a stalemated conflict?</h3>
Stalemate describes a situation in battle wherein neither side can alternate the front lines dramatically regardless of how tough it tries. WWII in no way reached a stalemate in Europe.
The warring parties alternated offensive and protective campaigns, however, they had constantly been moving. World War I epitomized a stalemate.
Therefore, the War on the Western Front from late 1914 to most of 1918 can be characterized as a stalemate during which little ground was gained. Thus, Option 1 is the correct choice.
Learn more about stalemate conflict here:
brainly.com/question/20719044
#SPJ1
A. Social Darwinism
A quote I found sums this question up, but it'd be better to do some side research.
-
"<span>the theory that individuals, groups, and peoples are subject to the same Darwinian laws of natural selection as plants and animals. Now largely discredited, social Darwinism was advocated by Herbert Spencer and others in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and was used to justify political conservatism, imperialism, and racism and to discourage intervention and reform."</span>
Answer: It have to be 3 I'm guessing
Explanation:
The answer is C, the executive branch mainly enforces federal laws!
} I hope this helped {
The correct answer is A) It brought about the unconditional surrender of Japan and ended the Second World War.
President Harry Truman decided two use two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945. The goal of these attacks were to bring an immediate end to World War II. This was seen as a last resort for Truman, as he and other leaders of the Allied powers already asked the Japanese to surrender. The Japanese refused to an unconditional surrender. If the US did not use these weapons, the war could have lasted significantly longer.
