1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ipn [44]
2 years ago
15

What assumption did the new york times “ethicist" contest call into question?

History
1 answer:
Alina [70]2 years ago
3 0
<span>The New York Times "ethicist" contest call into the question the assumption that it is natural and right to eat meat by asking people to write persuasive arguments in favor of eating meat.</span>
You might be interested in
Describe the actions of each group or person that led to the fall of the western Roman Empire.
Shalnov [3]

Answer:

Roman Government- levied heavy taxes on people

Roman Emperors-fought among themselves

Barbarian tribes-disrupted trade routes

Explanation:

  • According to the late fourth-century author Vegetius, troops wore armor up to the reign of Gratian, when they began to complain about how heavy it was and asked the emperor to forbid them from wearing it. Although historians debate this, Egypt, which was a part of the more prosperous Eastern Roman Empire, is the only location where Roman armor from the fifth century has been discovered.
  • After the division of the empire in 395, the West fared poorly. Prior East-West partitions had given the West the important province of Illyricum (modern Yugoslavia more or less). According to records, Gaul and Illyricum accounted for 56% of military recruitment between 284 and 476. In fact, helping to reclaim Illyricum to use for military recruiting was one of the reasons the Roman commander Stillicho attempted to form an alliance with the Gothic king Alaric. It was difficult to raise enough taxes to support a sizable military army due to the loss of wealthier provinces like Egypt to the Eastern empire and the fact that Gaul's economy had not yet recovered from the devastation of its towns during the Crisis of the Third Century.
  • When Theodosius' East Roman forces beat the Western army, it was still reeling from the disastrous loss at the Battle of Frigidus River.
  • Barbarian tribes with conflicted allegiance made up the majority of the army in the fifth century. The Suevic king Rechiar and a Gothic princess had a son named Ricimer. He killed the emperor when Majorian returned home from his expedition in North Africa against the Vandals. Perhaps he had grudges against Majorian for retaking Spain from the Sueves and the Goths (which collapsed against after his death). With the brief exception of Anthemius, who was imposed on the West by an Eastern Roman army, Ricimer governed through puppet emperors until his death in 472. After Anthemius killed himself by killing a follower of his named Romanus, Ricimer and Anthemius engaged in a civil war. Before the Eastern empire launched another expedition, Gundobad—the subsequent military leader and Ricimer's nephew—appointed Glycerius as the western emperor and departed Italy to become the Burgundians' king. During his brief reign as emperor in 475, Julius Nepos named Roman Orestes as Magister Militum (commander in chief of the army) and appointed him to rule over what was left of Roman Gaul (Provence). However, he abandoned Gaul and struck a deal with the barbarians in which he asked them to support him as emperor in exchange for one-third of Italy. After being expelled from Italy, Julius Nepos went to Dalmatia, where he was killed in 480. The western kingdom was toppled in 476 when Orestes betrayed his pledges to the barbarians. Odovocar, the barbarian ruler of Italy (perhaps from the Heruli tribe), put an end to the empire in the west.

Thanks,

Eddie

6 0
1 year ago
Some of the reasons for the Puritans desire to separate from the Church of England were
katrin2010 [14]
Who wished to separate from the perceived corruption of the Church One reason ^
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was appeasement an effective strategy against hitler's military aggression? provide evidence to justify your explanation
Roman55 [17]
I think appeasement is not a good strategy with Hitler. He was too obsessed with a power which made Chamberlain's appeasement not a solution to stop his military aggression. If Chamberlain did not enter this diplomatic relation he could have defeated Hitler earlier.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How to use subagent in sentence
coldgirl [10]
<span>The subagent owes the same duties to the broker's client as the broker.</span><span>
</span>
8 0
2 years ago
Someone pls help me with this I will make you as brain
tangare [24]

Answer:

The fitness gram pacer test

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened during the Reign of Terror in France?
    7·2 answers
  • What are some important dates in republic of Texas
    7·1 answer
  • Why did some people call 1950s youth the silent generation?
    6·1 answer
  • The Mongols were able to maintain control in China for an extended period because they a. maintained commercial policies that we
    8·1 answer
  • In what way did china's isolated geography contribute to its development as a country?
    7·1 answer
  • Muhammad is he founder of this great religion
    11·1 answer
  • How can we heal from the 9/11
    12·2 answers
  • Germany’s reparation payments after world war i caused
    7·2 answers
  • What were goods that gained European attention to Africa
    11·2 answers
  • Why is life so hard is it because we make too many mistakes in our life?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!