The SS guards do not care for other people's beliefs
Incomplete question. However, I answered from a general English perspective.
Answer:
<u>It refers to the inability to provide what is necessary for something or someone that we possess.</u>
Explanation:
We can see the meaning of such expression from the point of view of someone who is speaking on behave of a group stating<em>out his displeasure</em> that they're unable to provide what is necessary for their own; which can either be a person, or a property.
For example, a father and mother unable to provide enough food for their family may say in a low tone, "we can't take care of our own," referring to their children.
The correct answer is federal, state and local governments.
All three levels of government are limited in what they can do. For example, Congress is limited in terms of what laws they can make. Congress can make no law that will take away an individuals freedoms (like freedom of religion, freedom of press, etc.). All other levels of government are the same way.
Along with this, popular sovereignty is used at all levels of the government. Popular sovereignty is based on the idea of majority rule. Simply put, the person with the most votes wins. This concept is how we vote for mayors, senators, and other political figures in the US.
Answer:
C. The ruling determined that laws that violated the U.S. Constitution could be thrown out.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the best option would be that he had "consolidated power", since almost nobody was willing to challenge his authority. Many feared for their lives.</span>
