The correct answer is the last option: If you take away the suffix –n and the prefix un-, the root word is “know”.
Prefixes and suffixes are sets of letters that are added at the beginning (prefix) or end of a word (suffix). They are not words by themselves, but they do change the words' meanings or categories.
In this case, the root is know. The suffix -n is used to change the word's category from verb (know) to noun (known). While, the prefix un- is used to mean NOT. As a result the meaning of the word UNKOWN would be not known or familiar.
The first option, "[she] just couldn't stand another minute of the incessant howling", seems to be the best one to finish the paragraph. First of all, the paragraph has very specific and powerful vocabulary like "bopping his head" and "burst". So a concluding sentence should also have strong vocabulary. In this case "howling" is a very descriptive and powerful verb. Moreover, in the paragraph, the narrator mentions that "[the] lead singer sounded as (...) a dog lost in the woods". Using the word "howling", which is something done by dogs, in the concluding sentence would be consistant with the comparison between the singer and a lost dog.
I could be wrong but I think it’s a trick question as the only Asian ally to the nazis (that I’m aware of) is the Japanese
Answer:
A career ladder is a system where people can advance to higher levels of responsibility and compensation.
Explanation:
Effective commentary is simply giving an opinion or an interpretation, analysis, or evaluation about details of an essay. It is simply making a point of what you read.
The sentence that is an example of effective commentary on the evidence used in the paragraph is option A because they gave their opinion on what a career ladder is; which is a system where people can advance to higher levels of responsibility and compensation.
