Answer:
<u><em>Part 1. </em></u>
- <em>Average cost per day of a three-day pass</em> = $53.33/day per person
- <em>Marginal cost of adding the third day </em>= $190 - $160 = $30 per person
<em />
<em><u>Part 2.</u></em>
- <em>Group's marginal cost of switching from the two-day pass to the three-day pass</em> = $180
Explanation:
The total <em>cost</em> is the <em>admission charge</em> ($60) plust the cost of the pass ($100 or $130).
For a <em>two-day pass</em> that is: $60 + $100 = $160, per person
For a <em>three-day pass</em> that is: $60 + $130 = $190, per person
<u><em>Part 1. The average cost per day of a three-day pass per person. </em></u>
The <em>average cost</em> is the total cost divided by the number of days.
- <em>Average cost</em> = $160/3days = $53.33/day per person
The <em>marginal cost of adding the third day</em> per person is found by subtracting the total cost for two days from the total cost for three days:
- <em>Marginal cost of adding the third day</em> = $190 - $160 = $30 per person
This says that althoud the average cost for the three days is $53.33 the cost of adding the third day is $30, which is much lower; thus, it is a good deal to buy a three-days pass, as they are interested in spending a lot of time there.
<u><em>Part 2. The group's marginal cost of switching from the two-day pass to the three-day pass</em></u>
<em></em>
Since the <em>marginal cost of switching from the two-day pass to the three-day pass</em> is $30 per person, the marginal cost for the 6-person group is 6 times $30:
- 6 persons × $30/person = $180.
Answer:
C. A proposal of products that will solve the prospect's problems.
Explanation:
With regards to the above scenario, both Joan and Sarah put together a proposal of products that will solve the project's problems by critically analyzing the needs of the huge new prospect and providing various options.
Here, both staff knew the need of the prospect hence are able to come up with necessary questions and various solutions that would address the needs.
In addressing a need, various alternatives to providing solution to that need must be made available which is what was provided to the huge new client.
Answer: democratic leadership
Carmen stated a possible solution that was increasing tuition fee and then Carmen said that it should be considered. This means that she did not impose it that that is the only solution and that has to be done in any way, if she did then it would’ve been autocratic leadership.
Carmen left some room for discussion and this means it is a democratic approach in leadership.
Answer:
"$1,673,750" is the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
The given values in the question are:
Applied overhead,
= $666,250
Actual overhead,
= $650,000
Unadjusted cost,
= $1,690,000
Now,
The overapplied overhead will be:
= ![Applied \ overhead-Actual \ overhead](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Applied%20%5C%20overhead-Actual%20%5C%20overhead)
= ![666,250-650,000](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=666%2C250-650%2C000)
=
($)
hence,
The goods sold's adjusted cost will be:
= ![Unadjusted \ cost-Overapplied \ overhead](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Unadjusted%20%5C%20cost-Overapplied%20%5C%20overhead)
= ![1,690,000-16,250](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1%2C690%2C000-16%2C250)
=
($)
Answer: Congress gives too many tax breaks to corporations.
Explanation:
Normative statements are said to be statement of opinion and not fact.
Option D is therefore a normative statement because it is the opinion of the speaker that congress gives too many tax breaks because from a neutral standpoint, it cannot be said with certainty the number of tax breaks that will be considered too much.
The other options are statements of fact.