1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andreas93 [3]
3 years ago
10

Why were Louis Philippe and his prime minister Guizot overthrown in the Revolution of 1848? Select one: a. An influential group

of Frenchmen decided that they needed to support George Washington b. They were accused of hoarding grain c. That is when Napoleon Bonaparte took over France d. They cracked down on people who were having dinners in support of Republicanism
History
1 answer:
Vikki [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: d. They cracked down on people who were having dinners in support of Republicanism

Explanation:

Louis Philippe was the last King of France and was overthrown in the Revolution of 1948. This was by no means an isolated incident however as discontent had been growing in the kingdom for a while.

Discontent at poor economic reforms, Louis's refusal to grant political reforms, unemployment and bad harvests were some of the problems that bombarded Louis in his last few years as King and led to people opening calling for a Republic.

Activists who sought this Republic needed a way to meet and make their views known and as they could not do this through political gatherings and demonstrations which were outlawed, they turned to banquets.

In these banquets/ dinners, the people were able to speak their mind and criticize the regime to their hearts content. This did not sit well with the Government who decided to outlaw banquets in February 1948. This was <em>the Straw that broke the camel's back</em> and saw the people revolt against the monarchy. Louise then abdicated and fled to England.

You might be interested in
Why did Southerners argue states' rights were violated by abolition of slavery?
Zina [86]

Hello!

The correct answer is C) "Abolition violated states' rights to choose what their laws should be."

In the U.S., there are federal laws (that affect all states) and state laws that are implemented by the state and only affect that particular state. When Abolition was passed, the states argued that it restricted their freedom to create laws. Southern states supported slavery, and they felt that abolition (federal law) violated the states' rights to implement their own laws.

I hope this helps you! Have a lovely day!

- Mal

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which BEST describes the overall goals of Lincoln's Reconstruction plan?
Flauer [41]

Reconstruction was designed to rebuild southern states after the Civil war through physical,social,economic and political changes and aid.

Explanation

Reconstruction was the plan Abraham Lincoln and it was meant to integrate the southern states into the union. After the Civil war between the south and north,South was completely destroyed.

The economy of the south was completely dependent on agriculture and reconstruction intended to bring economic reforms to make south not so agriculture dependent and several changes in infrastructure were to be made.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is an accurate description of the Industrial Revolution? A. the transition from an economy based on agric
dusya [7]

Answer:

I believe it might be D

Explanation:

I think it's D b/c it's called the Industrial Revolution. SO wouldn't the answer have something to do with the revolution? (D) something to do with   the the Industrial Revolution so wouldn't make sense that that be the answer. Also revolution is another word for war. Industrial is another word for business. (D)  has to do with war, workers, and industrialist, so it makes sense that the answer would be (D).

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Qué fue lo que trajeron los procesos revolucionarios de fines del siglo XVIII?
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

I dont know I just want points

3 0
3 years ago
In what instance would direct democracy be applicable in a country?​
Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

Direct democracy or pure democracy is a form of democracy in which people decide on policy initiatives directly. This differs from the majority of currently established democracies, which are representative democracies. The theory and practice of direct democracy and participation as its common characteristic was the core of work of many theorists, philosophers, politicians, and social critics, among whom the most important are Jean Jacques Rousseau, John Stuart Mill, and G.D.H. Cole.[1]

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help me with History
    14·2 answers
  • Which term refers to the way a composition is constructed? <br><br> Answer is form <br> Apex
    15·1 answer
  • Organize the following events from the Progressive Era on the timeline.
    5·2 answers
  • Is labor a scarce resource or a free resource?
    10·2 answers
  • Is 3/4 grater or less than 2/3 I need help
    10·2 answers
  • What are some of the factors
    12·1 answer
  • What is one difference between tragedies and comedies
    10·1 answer
  • What did the Abolitionists do? worked for rights for African Americans fought for racial segregation they were black freedom fig
    9·1 answer
  • Literary Nonfiction
    5·1 answer
  • What were some of Jeffersons ideas of a great nation?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!