The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached or further context or references, we can say the following.
The extent that the cultural values of India, Japan, and Russia display distinct differences is notorious because they are completely different nations that developed under different circumstances.
The origins of India can be traced back to the Indus River Valley Civilization that settled next to the Indus River. The Harappans, another name that identifies this culture, was the first civilization in that region. In the evolution of India, people have professed different religious beliefs such as Brahmanism and Buddhism.
This last religious system can be connected with Japan, in that many Japanese people profess Buddhism. The other major religious belief in Japan is Shinto. Let's have in mind that Japan received a big influence from China in the early years.
In the case of Russia, after the time of the Tzars and the Russian Revolution, Russia became the Soviet Union under the Communist regimen that ended in 1991. The Russians mostly follow the Christian Orthodox religion.
Answer:
Shed light on:
- <u>Persian culture, </u>
- <u>Babylonian culture,</u>
- <u> Colchians</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
As part of his work on Persian culture, he talked about the life of the Persian King, Cyrus II of Persia. He discussed how the empire expanded over the world.
In his writings on Babylon culture, he spoke about Xerxes the Great of Babylon who is believed to have ruled from 486 to 465 BC.
report an contact them and delete them off the site and mark me brainliest
<span>arbitration is a form of dispute resolution. Arbitration is the private, judicial determination of a dispute, by an independent third party. An arbitration hearing may involve the use of an individual arbitrator or a tribunal. A tribunal may consist of any number of arbitrators though some legal systems insist on an odd number for obvious reasons of wishing to avoid a tie. One and three are the most common numbers of arbitrators. The disputing parties hand over their power to decide the dispute to the arbitrator(s). Arbitration is an alternative to court action (litigation), and generally, just as final and binding (unlike mediation, negotiation and conciliation which are non-binding).</span>
I don’t what happened be regarding to this mess of domestic of World War Two
