Answer: Mūsā I's pilgrimage caravan to Mecca in 1324 comprised some 60,000 people and an immeasurable amount of gold. He stopped in Cairo along the way, and his luxurious spending and gift giving was so extensive that he diluted the value of gold by 10 to 25 percent and impacted Cairo's economy for at least 12 years afterward.
The Oath of Justice is an affirmation that the President takes after assuming the presidency. The Oath is on Article II, Section One, Clause 8 of the US Constitution. The Constitution doesn’t demand a specific person to administer the oath of justice but it is common that the one to do it is the Chief of Justice. There have been some exceptions, for example when George Washington was sworn by Chancellor of New York.
The correct answer is Governor Faubus resisted the school’s integration with National Guard troops, and President Eisenhower sent federal troops to enforce integration.
After the Supreme Court case Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) the federal government called for the desegregation of schools all across America. This included Central High School. Central High School was previously an all white school. After Brown vs. Board of Education ruled segregated schools illegal, 9 black students enrolled at Central High School. These individuals would be known as the Little Rock 9.
After enrolling, these students tried to attend Central High School but were kept out by the national guard troops. This was due to Governor Fabius's disagreement with integrating white and black schools. However, President Eisenhower enforced the federal ruling by sending in federal troops to enforce the new ruling, allowing black and white students to attend the same school.
A country that has high political freedom typically offers
high economic freedom.
<span><span>Part of a series on</span>LiberalismSchools[show]Ideas[hide]<span>Civil and political rightsCultural liberalism<span>Democracy <span>Liberal democracy </span></span>Economic liberalismEgalitarianismFree marketFree tradeFreedom of the pressFreedom of religionFreedom of speechGender equalityHarm principleInternationalismLaissez-faireLibertyMarket economyNatural and legal rights<span>Negative / positive liberty</span>Open societyPermissive societyPrivate propertyRule of lawSecularismSeparation of church and stateSocial contractWelfare state</span>Variants[show]People[show]Organizations[show]Regional variants[show]Related topics[show]<span><span> Liberalism portal</span><span> Politics portal</span></span><span>vte</span></span>
Political freedom (also known as <span>political autonomy</span> or political agency) is a central concept in history and political thought and one of the most important features of democratic societies.Political freedom was described as freedom from oppression or coercion, the absence of disabling conditions for an individual and the fulfillment of enabling conditions, or the absence of life conditions of compulsion, e.g. economic compulsion, in a society. Although political freedom is often interpreted negatively as the freedom from unreasonable external constraints on action, it can also refer to the positive exercise of rights, capacities and possibilities for action, and the exercise of social or group rights. The concept can also include freedom from "internal" constraints on political action or speech (e.g. social conformity, consistency, or "inauthentic" behaviour). The concept of political freedom is closely connected with the concepts of civil liberties and human rights, which in democratic societies are usually afforded legal protection from the state.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
What Martin Luther King meant by saying that “let us not speak our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of hate,” was that the civil rights movement that he led, was never going to use violence as a form of protest or demonstration. Martin Luther King wanted to express dignity for other people and respect for other forms of thinking. That was part of his line of conduct, and for Dr. King, this represented great value and separate him from other activists that used violence, as was the case of Malcolm X.
What would MLK say about this today if he were alive?
Exactly the same. As we have seen in recent and pitful events in many places of the United States, racial segregation and racial violence are still very active in America. The use of non-violence would be his "flag" despite the terrible aggressions suffered by African Americans.