The answer should be D beacuse that part of yhe sentence is used as a verb phrase.
Answer:
C). The formation of acetic acid during wine production was due to the presence of contaminating microbes.
Explanation:
Pasteur's work focused on examining the 'French wine industry' to determine/conclude the required time as well as the temperature that would assist in killing/destroying the detrimental bacteria present in the wine without altering its taste. This process was later categorized as 'pasteurization'.
As per the question, Pasteur's work would prove all of the following except option C as it asserts an incorrect claim regarding 'The formation of acetic acid during wine production was due to the presence of contaminating microbes' as the conversion of ethanol present in wine leads to the formation of acetic acid. Therefore, Except <u>options C</u> all the options assert true claims.
Answer:
The first uses dialogue and character; the second uses first-person point of view.
Explanation:
The first excerpt is found in Chapter Eight titled "September 2nd, 1973" from <em>Fever 1793</em> by Laurie Halse Anderson is based on the yellow fever epidemic that ravaged Philadelphia. The story is from the point of view of the young Mattie Cook, describing how the pandemic had destroyed the lives of the people.
The second excerpt is from <em>The Summer of the Pestilence</em> by George Dodd Armstrong. The book also deals with the history of the same yellow fever that not only affected Philadelphia but also other parts of the nation such as Virginia.
While both books deal with the same pandemic, their dealing with the issue of unprecedented deaths differ a bit. The first book uses a dialogue-conversation approach, with the characters greatly involved whereas the second book uses the first person point of view to address the deaths. These two books may deal with the same issue but their approaches of the deaths and sick people differ such that their narrative plots also differ.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
This excerpt doesn't give much detail but I'm pretty sure this is Polyphemus speaking. He is a cyclops, and son of Poseidon. When Odysseus and his men were trapped in a cave with the giant man-eating cyclops, they plotted to blind him and escape. So Odysseus got Polyphemus drunk on some kind of wine and waited for him to pass out. Then they got a huge stick or branch, sharpened the end and plunged it into the giant's eye. One can easily surmise that Polyphemus would seek revenge for this, so answer B is definite. Answer A might be an additional factor, as Polyphemus does refer to him in this passage as "raider of cities"--indicating perhaps some disapproval--but the damage to his (only!) eye would be the most important issue, since that is personal.
Answer:
To shape how the reader sees the experience of traveling on the President Taft
Explanation:
I think this is the answer based on the passage. Sorry in advanced if this is the wrong answer!
