All categories

3 years ago

The Federal Art Project set a precedent for

History

2 answers:

kati45 [8]3 years ago

4 0

Your Answer Will Be "B"

MrRissso [65]3 years ago

3 0

Federal funding of the arts and artists.

Further Explanation:

The project related to the Federal arts was the first major attempt that was made by the government of the United States in the field of Visual Arts and it is considered as among most extensive and influential projects related to the visual arts during the period of depression in year 1930s and this was under the administration of the President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This program is most often confused with the department of treasury programs. But, the federal art project employed artists who had wide experience and styles and they sponsored a more varied body of art and it also had far greater influence on the American movements.

Most of the artists during that period were employed from relief rolls and also a small number of non-relief artists were employed in supervisory positions. These Artists used to get 23.50 dollars per week as part of their wage and in return, they were expected to turn in one week along with the specified number of days on some project related to the architectural sculpture project.

Learn More:

1. During criminal cases, what is guaranteed by the constitution?

brainly.com/question/1769121

2. What caused Great Britain and France to declare war on Germany in 1939?

brainly.com/question/1150550

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Federal Arts Project

Subject: History

Keywords: Federal arts, Employed, Arts, Artists, Sculpture, Supervisory, Treasury, Programs, Influence, Sponsored, Experienced.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP ME!!!!

Julli [10]

Hello, Well unfortunately there isnt a list of people who tried to figure out the Rosetta Stone but here is the french egyptologist who first read the Rosetta Stone he goes by the name Jean Francois Champollion and this was around the years 1790-1832.

7 0

2 years ago

What was the cotton gin? How did it have a negative impact rather than positive?

kobusy [5.1K]

It could clean then produce cotton tenfold the time it would take a normal human. It had a negative impact because since it would clean cotton so fast many plantation owners bought more cotton (the more the cotton the more the money). But more cotton requires more harvesters so these plantation owners also would buy more slaves. This of course was not good since this commenced through out the whole country causing a massive spike of slaves to be purchased. If you have any more questions just ask :)

4 0

2 years ago

In the south, part of the Allies' new strategy was to invade Europe through Germany. Austria. France. Italy.

vazorg [7]

During World War II, The Allies decided to invade Germany as a part of the definite strategy to end the war.

They planed Offensive Operations to capture the east and west bank of the Rhine River. Among those operations were Operation Granade, Veritable, Undertone and Lumberjack, between February and March of 1945.

Allied troops crossed the Rhine River and entered through Austria. In the Eastern front, Russian troops defeated the Germans and liberated Poland.

General Dwight D. Eisenhower was the commander of the Allied troops in Northern and Central Europe.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Zora neale hurston labeled whites who were fascinated with life in harlem and other black communities as

Evgen [1.6K]

The answer that completes the statement above is NEGROTARIANS. Zora Neale Hurston is actually a known American-African novelist and writer who focused her work more on racial differences and struggles. This term was quoted by her. Actually, Hurston was one of the members of young African American novelists namely the Ni*gerati Manor which was formed during the Harlem Renaissance.

7 0

2 years ago

The government under the articles of confederation was not effective, why were there not more efforts to improve it?

Over [174]

Congress lacked the authority to regulate foreign and interstate commerce. There was no executive branch to carry out any legislation passed by Congress. There were no national courts or judicial branches. Articles of Confederation amendments required a unanimous vote.

Concerned about Strong National Government nonetheless, the Articles of Confederation became increasingly ineffective at governing the rapidly expanding American states during their brief existence. The main reason for this ineffectiveness was a lack of a strong central government.

Ultimately, the Articles of Confederation failed because they were crafted to keep the national government as weak as possible. There was no power to enforce laws.

To know about Articles of Confederation here

brainly.com/question/13608970

#SPJ4

7 0

1 year ago