All categories

3 years ago

The Federal Art Project set a precedent for

History

2 answers:

kati45 [8]3 years ago

4 0

Your Answer Will Be "B"

MrRissso [65]3 years ago

3 0

Federal funding of the arts and artists.

Further Explanation:

The project related to the Federal arts was the first major attempt that was made by the government of the United States in the field of Visual Arts and it is considered as among most extensive and influential projects related to the visual arts during the period of depression in year 1930s and this was under the administration of the President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This program is most often confused with the department of treasury programs. But, the federal art project employed artists who had wide experience and styles and they sponsored a more varied body of art and it also had far greater influence on the American movements.

Most of the artists during that period were employed from relief rolls and also a small number of non-relief artists were employed in supervisory positions. These Artists used to get 23.50 dollars per week as part of their wage and in return, they were expected to turn in one week along with the specified number of days on some project related to the architectural sculpture project.

Learn More:

1. During criminal cases, what is guaranteed by the constitution?

brainly.com/question/1769121

2. What caused Great Britain and France to declare war on Germany in 1939?

brainly.com/question/1150550

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Federal Arts Project

Subject: History

Keywords: Federal arts, Employed, Arts, Artists, Sculpture, Supervisory, Treasury, Programs, Influence, Sponsored, Experienced.

You might be interested in

What was a main difference between Chinese communism and Soviet communism? A. Chinese communist leaders were unified in their su

qwelly [4]

A.) Chinese communist leaders worked directly to serve rural peasants. Soviet leaders viewed themselves as guides for urban workers.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In your opinion has the United States been a leader in the global economy in recent decades? Explain your reasoning.?

vodomira [7]

Answer:

The US has had the leading economy since it has a controlled economy and it manages its money but the US's economy is going to start going down if they don't stop wasting/spending money.

3 0

3 years ago

Where was Assyria located

Natali [406]

Answer:

It is located in the northern part of Mesopotamia.

Hope it helps you.

6 0

2 years ago

Mercantilism is ________________________________

Nezavi [6.7K]

A system in which countries kept their sole right to trade with their colonies

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the arms race affect the US foreign policy PLEASE HELP!!

Bond [772]

Answer:

I hope it helps u.

Explanation:

Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.

Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.

Mark me as brainlist answer,

Have a nice day,

Thank you ☺

8 0

3 years ago