The Missouri Compromise (1820) was a compromise that was reached between the North and the South and approved by the country. The 24th state to be admitted was Missouri thanks to Congress (1821). The protracted inter-sectional conflict over the expansion of slavery that eventually resulted in the American Civil War began at that time.
What was the Missouri Compromise?
A law known as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 attempted to alleviate escalating tensions between sections of society over the subject of slavery. The United States enacted the bill, which President James Monroe then signed. Maine was admitted as a free state, and Missouri, a state that permitted slavery, was added to the Union by Congress. The remaining Louisiana Purchase territories north of the 36o 30' line were also exempt from the slavery restriction (the southern border of Missouri). Just over 30 years would pass until the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 abolished the Missouri Compromise. The compromise was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision in 1857, which opened the door for the Civil War.
To know more about Missouri Compromise check out:
brainly.com/question/14383383
#SPJ4
Incomplete question. Here are the options:
- He thinks kings get too much money and do harm to the country.
- He thinks kings have a right to rule the country, but do not do a good job.
- He thinks kings should be allowed to make important decisions.
- He thinks kings should be worshipped only by members of their church
Answer:
<u>"He thinks kings get too much money and do harm to the country"</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
From the quote, we could infer that Thomas Paine was disappointed with the fact that a King was given so much financial privilege which could result in the harm of a country.
We note this from his entire statement, which reads,
<em>“In England, a king hath little more to do than to make war and give away places; which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nation and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousand sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain!</em><em> Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.”</em>
Answer:
3
Explanation:
Executive, Judicial, and Legeslative.
The tension between novelty and predictability is related to the individual desire when in exclusive relationship and this explains relationship dialectics theory.
- Relational dialectics can be regarded as an interpersonal communication theory which stressed that personal ties as well as relationships usually highlights the tensions as well as struggles between contrary tendencies.
- It stressed about exclusive relationship if individual which is governed by novelty.
Therefore, novelty; predictability are the right answers.
Learn more at,:
brainly.com/question/25371796
