Answer:
A. $600
Explanation:
The formula and the computation of the Marginal propensity to consume are shown below:
Marginal propensity to consume = Change in consumer spending ÷ Change in disposal income
0.6 = Change in consumer spending ÷ $1,000
So, the change in consumer spending is
= $1,000 × 0.6
= $600
Hence, the consumption that is given in the question is not considered. Therefore, ignored it
Answer: (A) Antitrust
Explanation:
Antitrust is one of the type of law that basically monitor the economical power distribution in terms of business.
It is basically refers to the competitive law which is developed by the united state government for protecting the consumers from the various types of business practices.
It mainly ensure that the fairness in the competition in the market. Antitrust concerns are mainly focus on the institutional acquisitions and the alliances.
Therefore, Option (A) is correct.
Answer:
$0
Explanation:
A client can only sue a stockbroker, a financial advisor, etc., only if they made them loss money through fraud or negligence. But in this case, May (stockbroker) apparently made a mistake of value, she did nothing illegal. She might be a terrible broker, but that doesn't make her a criminal. She also didn't breach any fiduciary duty, since investing always carries a risk. If Nora doesn't like to assume risks, then she should purchase government bonds.
Answer: $54,000
Explanation:
Referring to the data regarding store operation given above, difference between cash receipt and cash disbursement for December could be calculated as follows;
December Cash receipt = (340,000*20%+320,000*80%) = 324,000
November Purchases = (340,000 × 75%)+(320,000 × 75% × 60%) - 153,000 = 246,000
December Cash payment = 246,000 +240,000 = 270,000
The difference between cash receipts and cash disbursement for December = 324,000 - 270,000 = 54,000
