Substantive disagreement may never be resolved because it leads to clashes of opinions.
A disagreement or argument is said to be substantial if it centers on the presentation of divergent viewpoints regarding the truth or the adherence to opposing ideals.
There must be a means to distinguish substantive disagreement (SD) from conceptual disagreement if legal concepts can be the subject of SD. Arguments that persons debating a certain philosophical problem are only having a linguistic argument are one approach to reject the substantiveness of the issue. For instance, it has been argued that the seeming conflict over the mind/brain identity thesis is only a word one and that there is no real controversy over whether or not mental traits are the same as neurological ones.
To know more about Substantive disagreement refer to:
brainly.com/question/28085499
#SPJ1
Answer:
Developed nations are generally categorised as countries that are more industrialised and higher per capital income levels. Developing nations are generally categorised as countries that are less industrialised and have lower per capital income levels.
<span>United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble</span>
It’s a celebration of African American culture starting December 26 until January 1st
This is true. The word that is used in the UN charter to refer to them is "recommendations', and they are in fact not binding, but more like suggestions.