1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotykmax [81]
3 years ago
14

What is the difference between the roman republic and the roman empire​

History
1 answer:
jek_recluse [69]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Roman Republic was an unequal system where Patricians(the elite) had special rights and power for most of the Republican existence, whereas other people living in Rome were divided between free Roman citizens, non-citizens who had reduced rights, and slaves who has no rights.

The Roman Empire was an empire ruled by emperors that controlled parts of the Mediterranean as well as parts of Asia and Africa, during their rule, Rome was one of the most powerful cities in the world.

You might be interested in
Which statement best explains why the colony of New York had a diverse population? The colony was settled by people from several
Alexxx [7]
New York was settled by the Dutch... i would go with option A
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Andrew Jackson opposed the national bank because:
stiks02 [169]
It was seen as unconstitutional.
6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE I NEED HELP ASAP WILL MARK BRAINLEST
Rzqust [24]

Answer: Under the Reagan administration, U.S. support for the Afghan mujahideen evolved into a centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy, called the Reagan Doctrine, in which the U.S. provided military and other support to anti-communist resistance movements in Afghanistan, Angola, and Nicaragua.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP I DO NOT KNOW THIS ONE!..
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

I just took the quiz, that is the correct answer

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Dr. King, why are the results of violent resistance inferior to those of nonviolent
Mars2501 [29]

First, one can resist evil without resorting to violence. Second, nonviolence seeks to win the “friendship and understanding” of the opponent, not to humiliate him (King, Stride, 84). Third, evil itself, not the people committing evil acts, should be opposed.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Conflict between witch two groups had the greatest effect on Gandhi's vision of a free and united india.
    11·2 answers
  • What was the economic relationship between the North and the South in the early 1800s?
    10·1 answer
  • The poem silhouette by Langston Hughes focused on which southern event?
    6·2 answers
  • Which was not an impact of railroads on industry in the 1800s? A. Raw materials and finished goods could be shipped more quickly
    10·1 answer
  • How did Hitler eliminate radical worker unions in Germany?
    13·1 answer
  • Try These out for Me I’ll give you brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • 1. The Black Death caused a decline in _____.
    9·2 answers
  • The best definition of nationalism is devotion and loyalty to one’s
    8·2 answers
  • Besides combat, how were african americans involved in the war effort
    14·1 answer
  • PlZ ANSWER ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!