Answer:
drag the central argument Paine presents and it's two claims to complete the chart . Argument Claims
Three ways in which the compromise of 1850 affect enslavement laws:
(A) Kansas is admitted to the union as a pro-enslavement state.
(B) California is admitted to the union as an anti-enslavement state.
(D) The fugitive slave act demands the arrest of those who escaped enslavement.
<h3>
The compromise of 1850:</h3>
- The 1850 Compromise served as a brief truce on the issue of slavery, addressing particularly the status of newly acquired territory following the Mexican-American War.
- California was admitted to the Union as a free state under the Compromise; the slave trade was outlawed in Washington, D.C.
- Strict new Fugitive Slave Act compelled citizens of free states to assist in the capture of enslaved people, and the new territories of Utah and New Mexico would allow white residents to decide whether to allow slavery.
- The Compromise, in the end, did not resolve the question of slavery's extension; instead, the heated rhetoric surrounding the Compromise further alienated the North and South.
Therefore, three ways in which the compromise of 1850 affect enslavement laws:
(A) Kansas is admitted to the union as a pro-enslavement state.
(B) California is admitted to the union as an anti-enslavement state.
(D) The fugitive slave act demands the arrest of those who escaped enslavement.
Know more about The compromise of 1850 here:
brainly.com/question/8165267
#SPJ4
Complete question:
In what ways did the compromise of 1850 affect enslavement laws?
select three answers.
(A) kansas is admitted to the union as a pro-enslavement state.
(B) California is admitted to the union as an anti-enslavement state.
(C) federal laws allow enforced enslavement in the Kansas territory.
(D) the fugitive slave act demands the arrest of those who escaped enslavement.
Neville Chamberlain was the Prime Minister of England from 1937-1940. Chamberlain is infamous for 'appeasing' to Germany's demands to restructure itself after paying its immense reparations for the first World War I. A large reason that he appeased to Germany's desire to revamp its military, economy, and expand its territory was so that he may focus on England's domestic affairs. Notably, he passed several acts and laws for the middle class, one giving workers a week off with pay (Holiday with Pay Act 1938), as well as passing the Factory's Act of 1937 which greatly helped working conditions for women and children and limiting hours of work. While he primarily wanted to focus on domestic affairs, his appeasement policy immensely backfired when Germany's power skyrocketed by the end of the 1930's.
Answer:
In my opinion, the United States does not follow this doctrine, although there are no longer any cases of "new countries" if there is the case of strong countries, including the United States, and developing or third world countries, as there are in Latin America, where the United States has been accused of intervening:
- Support the coup d'etat of Pinochet in Chile under the government of President Nixon in 1973.
- Orchestrate the coup against Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1984.
- Suppress protests in foreign countries as happened in Panama in 1964 under the mandate of President Johnson (APARICIO PINDADO, Daniel. 2016).
As well as the constant invasion of Middle Eastern countries in the search for nuclear weapons or terrorist groups that could threaten US sovereignty, as well as the recent friction with Iran.
Therefore, the inclusion of the United States as a strong country vis-à-vis other countries is undeniable and demonstrates that the Monroe doctrine (attributed to President James Monroe) is no longer applied by the country, at a time when more than ever countries should exercise their own government and be architects of its future.
Explanation:
The United States has been involved in different acts around the world that would suggest that the Monroe doctrine should only be applied when the country was a new or weak country, now that it is a strong country, it does not consider that doctrine applicable.
Answer:
aganda civil servants also helped administer other ethnic groups, and Uganda's early history was written from the perspective of the Baganda and the colonial officials who became accustomed to dealing with them.
Explanation:
