Answer:
The answer is:
The Kincaids can sue David and Sandra Dess because they can be considered intended beneficiaries of the contract between them and Sirva.
Explanation:
Intended beneficiaries are third parties in a contract that can sue the promisor for breach of contract.
In the contract, David and Sandra agreed to fully disclose all information about the property. Under the terms of the contract, they agreed that Sirva and "other prospective buyers" could rely on their disclosures.
The scenario you described suggests that the Law of Demand is correct.
Increase in price will always lead to loss of demand, while replacements for that product will grow in demand.
Answer:
unrelated diversification
Explanation:
The unrelated diversification strategy is a strategy in which an organization decides to manufacture a new product or offer a new service that is not related to the products or services they currently produce and enter into a new market. According to this, the answer is that Rocco is advocating an unrelated diversification strategy because he is proposing to enter to new markets to decrease the risk of depending on one.
