<span><span>Appositive is noun or noun phrase in
which retitles, renames and helps describe the noun that is adjacent to it in
the sentence. The appositive is like a more clear illustration or wants to
illuminate the said subject in the statement. </span>
<span>1. The appositive word in the sentence is the
author. Which describes and renames Gary Jackson in the sentence</span> </span>
<span>
2. It renames Charles Dickens.</span>
The triangle trade, also called Western or Atlantic slave trafficking, was a slave trade conducted between Europe, Africa and the Americas between the XVIe and XIX centuries. Its aim was to provide black slaves to colonies of the New World (America), to supply Europe with products from these settlements and to sell in Africa,European and American products. This was, for the European ships, to bring to the Atlantic coasts of Africa different goods of European origin, objects of little value, guns, weapons... highly appreciated by Africans. Goods were exchanged for black African prisoners, who were then forced to go to Americas. Here men, women, children... were sold as slaves to work in the cotton or sugar cane fields.The ships then returned to Europe with American coffee, sugar, cotton, rum which were resold. This trade lasted from the XVIe century until the early XIXe century. They say it was triangular because, on a map, it was represented by arrows connecting Europe, Africa and America which draw a triangle.
I think is d because true way
Answer:
A
Explanation:
if you don't already know the synonym to the word your best choice is to use it in a sentence and work from there
Answer:
<em> </em>
<em>State power is widely thought to be coercive. The view that governments must wield force or that their power is necessarily coercive is widespread in contemporary political thought. John Rawls is representative in claiming that (political power is always coercive power backed up by the government(s use of sanctions, for government alone has the authority to use force in upholding its laws.( This belief in the centrality of coercion and force plays an important but not well appreciated role in contemporary political thought. I wish to challenge this belief and the considerations that motivate it. States are not necessarily coercive or coercive (by definition.( Their claimed authority is prior to the force they wield. Legitimate states should need to resort to coercion and force much less than other states, and that fact seems unappreciated in contemporary political thought.Explanation:</em>
<em>Carry</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>learning</em>
