Answer:
To seclude and divide from another country or area.
Explanation:
Rivers, mountain ranges, oceans, and deserts can all serve as physical boundaries. Many times, political boundaries between countries or states form along physical boundaries. For example, the boundary between France and Spain follows the peaks of the Pyrenees Mountains, while the Alps separate France from Italy.
<em>Answer:(MAKE ME BRAINLIEST)(EDIT IT THE WAY YOU LIKE...)</em>
<em>This was an all out war since it included all areas of society, including men, ladies and youngsters. A portion of the jobs that ladies played were novel, many were most certainly not. However even customary ladylike occupations and pursuits could turn out to be essential for an advanced war exertion. From the soonest days of the contention, homegrown undertakings like sewing and sewing took on a military cast as young ladies and ladies made high quality solaces for warriors. Notwithstanding the penances requested from ladies who gave up their friends and family, as the war proceeded with states requested that ladies 'penance' (a word frequently summoned) numerous different things. The Partnered bar of the Focal Forces obliged ladies companions to acknowledge apportioning, and along these lines to manage without explicit groceries. Austrian, German, Russian and in the end French and English ladies all figured out how to manage with less and, considerably more agonizingly, as far as possible on what they could accommodate their families just as themselves.I was terrified. One of the additional telling tokens of how the war changed ladies' fundamental ability to be self aware can be found in offers that German ladies give even their long hair to the war effort.Women supported their countries from numerous points of view. Most common ladies previously worked outside the home for compensation just as embraced homegrown obligations inside the home. Female assembly line laborers kept on laboring close by men; they supported the creation of materials (counting garbs) however numerous likewise moved into metal working in manufacturing plants, making war material, for example, weapons. Manufacturing plant work and pursued work were not new for large numbers of these ladies. Notwithstanding, the generous move of female specialists from things like homegrown assistance into modern work, and a development of the scope of undertakings inside plants and different workspaces, was phenomenal. The generally flowed pictures of ladies taking on mechanical, war-related work, for example, the Italian ladies included here, fortified the message that ladies were putting forth fundamental commitments to the war attempt instead of their prepared and missing men. For sure such ladies turned into a key monetary power so the strike by French ladies, envisioned here, caused a lot of frustration for the public authority which was at the same time wrestling with uprisings and unfortunate of complaints (for example about wages and working conditions yet additionally about the actual war). Much more essentially, a strike by ladies in the early long stretches of 1917 in Petrograd helped sparkle the Russian Revolution.Perhaps as amazingly, a few ladies took on remarkable jobs that straightforwardly supported the military. While military nursing was additionally not new, its positions significantly extended across numerous countries. Likewise, the war saw a more extensive support of female specialists. More straightforward guide to armed forces came as recently settled ladies' assistants, for example, the Ladies' Military Helper Corps. In Russia, ladies even joined battle powers, as the Russian Ladies' Legions of Death took to the field in the late spring of 1917.</em>
Similarities:
Both empires emerged in the 14th and 15th centuries as postclassic civilizations building on the innovations of earlier political powers but expanding to greater extents
Both empires were entirely infantry, but well supplied, well-organized, and extremely aggressive and militaristic. Javelins, slings, spears and maces were used in battle.
Both empires had inherent instabilities
Both empires were fueled by corn.
Both empires have little to no seafaring, and instead stuck to the mountains and valleys in the center of the region.
Both empires conquered hundreds of cities in the region that resented their rule and taxation
Both empires were ended by Spanish invasions that capitalized on native divisions, introduced disease, and Spanish technology of guns, horses, and steel.
Both empires are misnamed-the Inka was the ruler of Tawantinsuyu, and the Aztecs adopted the name Mexica.
Both empires provided public education
Both Atahualpa and Moctezuma decided against confronting the Spanish militarily, allowing for the Spanish to take the Emperors hostage.
Attempts to restore the monarchy came after the capture and death of the emperor, but were too late.
Differences:
The Incas were bronze age, Aztecs were stone age
THe Incas assigned governors and shuffled conquered peoples around. There was a greater centralization than in Mexico
The Aztecs were a tributary empire, not a direct one.
The Aztecs had writing, while the Incas used Quipu
The Aztecs still had many rivals left unsubdued
The Inca used mostly potatoes while corn was far more dominant in Mexico.
The Inca had llamas, small but important livestock that made transport easier
The Inca had a sophisticated courier system of Chasquis along state-maintained roads
The Inca used bronze axes and halberds, with slings and maces as their main weapons alongside spears. The Aztecs used obsidian swords and glaives instead for close combat, and used javelins far more. Likewise, while Inca military relied on the unit’s experience and officer corps for their quality like the Romans, the Aztecs instead had a feudalistic division between the elite knights and commoners, with advancement by taking captives.
The Inca allowed women into their schools but not commoners. The Aztecs prohibited women but allowed for peasant men to also gain an education.
The diseases that destroyed the Incas came before the Spanish actually arrived in Peru, while the Spanish had been in Mexico for months before the plagues killed the emperor and populace.
Moctezuma’s mistake was trying to use generosity to awe the Spanish and try to coax them on his side, while Atahualpa’s was trying to awe them with his army rather than actually using it.
The Inca political crisis was a civil war between two brothers, while the Aztec’s was a three way duel between the King, the Priests, and the Aristocracy and military.
President Lincoln's First Inaugural Address focused on reassuring the Southern states that the president would not try to strip them of their slaves and that he would try to find a way to help them secure slavery if it would make them happy.
